Bringing Real Ideas, Data, and Genuine Experience to Congress Resolution or the BRIDGE to Congress ResolutionThis resolution modifies the House Rules regarding remote testimony of witnesses in committee proceedings. Specifically, the resolution eliminates the requirement for the committee chair to approve remote testimony of witnesses.
If passed, HR28 would significantly enhance the ability of diverse stakeholders to participate in the legislative process, enabling a broader range of voices and experiences to be heard. The resolution reflects an understanding of how technology can facilitate democratic engagement, especially for those who may not otherwise be able to attend in person due to distance, financial constraints, or other barriers. By simplifying the process for witnesses to provide testimony remotely, the resolution could improve the quality and breadth of information available to lawmakers during committee discussions.
House Resolution 28, known as the BRIDGE to Congress Resolution, aims to eliminate the current restriction that allows witnesses to appear remotely at committee proceedings of the House of Representatives solely at the discretion of the committee chair. The resolution promotes the idea of accessibility and inclusivity in the legislative process by ensuring that witnesses can testify remotely without facing arbitrary limitations set by committee chairs. This change is intended to make the legislative process more flexible and accommodating, particularly in a context where remote participation has become more commonplace due to varying circumstances such as health concerns or geographical constraints.
While HR28 has the potential for positive impacts on accessibility and transparency, it may face opposition from committee chairs who value their discretion in managing committee proceedings. Some lawmakers may express concerns that remote testimonies could undermine the dynamics of in-person discussions or reduce accountability, as remote witnesses may not engage in the same way as those who are physically present. Additionally, there may be debates over the technical aspects of remote participation and the integrity of the testimony provided in such formats.