Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

Us Congress Senate Bill SB852

Introduced
3/5/25  

Caption

Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025

Impact

One of the notable impacts of SB852 includes the modification of procedures surrounding unfair labor practices. Employers found to have interfered with union activities face increased penalties, thereby encouraging compliance with labor laws. The bill also mandates quicker election processes for union representation, aiming to expedite the ability of workers to organize and bargain collectively without undue delays. Additionally, enhanced damages for unfair labor practices are introduced, which could lead to more favorable outcomes for employees who have been wronged. This shift towards more robust penalties reflects a deliberate intent to deter anti-union activities.

Summary

SB852, known as the Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025, proposes significant amendments to the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, and the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959. At its core, the bill aims to enhance labor rights and protections for employees, promoting collective bargaining and union representation. The legislation introduces new definitions for 'joint employer,' thereby expanding the scenarios in which two employers can be held accountable for labor practices concerning shared control over employees. This change is vital in providing workers with more substantial grounds for seeking redress from employers who may evade their responsibilities by claiming independent contractor status for workers.

Contention

Despite its intentions, SB852 is not without controversy. Critics argue that the provisions enhancing penalties and expanding definitions may create undue burdens on employers, especially small businesses. Additionally, the changes regarding joint employer status may complicate existing labor relations and contractual obligations. Some stakeholders express concern that the bill may lead to increased litigation and operational disruptions within industries reliant upon flexible labor arrangements. These tensions illustrate the fundamental clash between advocating for workers' rights and addressing the operational capacities of employers in a changing economic landscape.

Congress_id

119-S-852

Policy_area

Labor and Employment

Introduced_date

2025-03-05

Companion Bills

US HB20

Related bill Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2025

Similar Bills

US SB199

United States-Taiwan Tax Agreement Authorization Act United States-Taiwan Expedited Double-Tax Relief Act

US SB91

Western Wildfire Support Act of 2025

US HB2709

Save Our Sequoias Act

US SB882

Patients Before Middlemen Act

US SB689

Tule River Tribe Reserved Water Rights Settlement Act of 2025

US HB2281

Strengthening Job Corps Act of 2025

US HB1324

Navajo Nation Rio San José Stream System Water Rights Settlement Act of 2025

US HB471

Fix Our Forests ActThis bill establishes requirements for managing forests on federal land, including requirements concerning reducing wildfire threats, expediting the review of certain forest management projects, and implementing forest management projects and other activities.Specifically, the bill (1) designates certain firesheds at high risk for wildfires as fireshed management areas; (2) directs the U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Geological Survey to jointly establish an interagency Fireshed Center that is responsible for duties related to assessing and predicting fire, including maintaining a fireshed registry on a publicly accessible website that provides interactive geospatial data on individual firesheds; and (3) makes other requirements related to reducing wildfire.Next, the bill expedites the review of certain forest management projects under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 and exempts certain activities from NEPA review. It also establishes intra-agency strike teams to accelerate the review and any interagency consultation processes under NEPA, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, and the National Historic Preservation Act. It also limits consultation requirements concerning threatened and endangered species under the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 and the Federal Land Management and Policy Act of 1976. Finally, it limits litigation involving fireshed management projects and limits remedies that courts may provide.Additionally, the bill supports reducing community wildfire risks, carrying out forest restoration and stewardship activities (including watershed protection and restoration), conducting biochar demonstration projects, advancing technologies to address forest wildfires, and assisting wildland firefighters and their families.