Us Congress Senate Bill SJR12

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/4/25
• Refer: 2/4/25

Caption

This joint resolution nullifies the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule titled Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions and published on November 18, 2024. The rule outlines compliance requirements under the Methane Emissions Reduction Program. Under the program, the EPA collects an annual charge on emissions of methane and other greenhouse gases from entities in the oil and gas sector if their emissions exceed specified waste emissions thresholds.

Impact

If SJR12 is enacted, it would prevent the implementation of the EPA's current rule, thereby impacting the regulatory framework surrounding waste emissions from petroleum and natural gas operations. The legislation reflects a broader push among certain congressional members to limit the regulatory power of federal agencies, especially regarding environmental regulations that affect key industries. The disapproval could lead to increased emissions from these systems, as companies may not be compelled to adopt the compliance measures initially proposed by the EPA.

Summary

SJR12 is a joint resolution introduced in the Senate to disapprove a rule from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concerning waste emissions charges for petroleum and natural gas systems. The rule detailed procedures for facilitating compliance, including netting and exemptions relevant to the petroleum and natural gas industries. The resolution aims to nullify this rule, effectively indicating Congress's discontent with the EPA's regulation in this domain. As it proceeded through the legislative process, it was placed on the calendar for further consideration after being discharged from the committee by petition.

Sentiment

Discussion around SJR12 has shown a favorable sentiment among its sponsors, primarily Republican legislators who view the resolution as a necessary step in reducing regulatory burdens on the energy sector. In contrast, opponents of the resolution may express concerns regarding environmental protection and public health implications. This divide illustrates a fundamental tension between regulatory oversight and business interests, with advocates for disapproval often prioritizing economic growth over environmental regulations.

Contention

The primary contention surrounding SJR12 arises from its implications for environmental management in the energy industry. Advocates for the bill argue that the EPA's rule could impose undue financial burdens on companies, thereby hindering energy production and economic growth. Conversely, critics argue that disapproving the emissions rules could exacerbate environmental issues and undermine public health safeguards. The resolution thus serves as a focal point for broader debates about the role of government in regulating environmental practices in the face of industrial interests.

Congress_id

119-SJRES-12

Policy_area

Environmental Protection

Introduced_date

2025-02-04