| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | IIA | |
| 2 | 2 | 119THCONGRESS | |
| 3 | 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | STSESSION S. J. RES. 29 | |
| 5 | 5 | Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United | |
| 6 | 6 | States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection | |
| 7 | 7 | Agency relating to ‘‘Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Withdrawal of Technical | |
| 8 | 8 | Amendment’’. | |
| 9 | 9 | IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES | |
| 10 | 10 | MARCH3, 2025 | |
| 11 | 11 | Mr. H | |
| 12 | 12 | USTED(for himself and Mr. MORENO) introduced the following joint | |
| 13 | 13 | resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Envi- | |
| 14 | 14 | ronment and Public Works | |
| 15 | 15 | JOINT RESOLUTION | |
| 16 | 16 | Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of | |
| 17 | 17 | title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by | |
| 18 | 18 | the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Air | |
| 19 | 19 | Plan Approval; Ohio; Withdrawal of Technical Amend- | |
| 20 | 20 | ment’’. | |
| 21 | 21 | Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives1 | |
| 22 | 22 | of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 2 | |
| 23 | 23 | That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the En-3 | |
| 24 | 24 | vironmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘Air Plan Ap-4 | |
| 25 | 25 | proval; Ohio; Withdrawal of Technical Amendment’’ (90 5 | |
| 26 | 26 | VerDate Sep 11 2014 00:56 Mar 04, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\SJ29.IS SJ29 | |
| 27 | 27 | kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB 2 | |
| 28 | 28 | •SJ 29 IS | |
| 29 | 29 | Fed. Reg. 6811 (January 21, 2025)), and such rule shall 1 | |
| 30 | 30 | have no force or effect. 2 | |
| 31 | 31 | Æ | |
| 32 | 32 | VerDate Sep 11 2014 00:56 Mar 04, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6301 E:\BILLS\SJ29.IS SJ29 | |
| 33 | 33 | kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB |