Utah 2022 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0045

Introduced
1/18/22  
Engrossed
1/21/22  
Refer
1/26/22  
Report Pass
2/1/22  
Enrolled
3/10/22  

Caption

Justice Court Judge Elections Amendments

Impact

The new provisions introduced by HB 0045 include amending ballot requirements to reflect a more structured electoral process for judges. Specifically, after their initial retention election, Supreme Court justices will appear on the ballot every tenth year, while judges of other courts will do so every sixth year. This change aims to create a consistent schedule for judicial accountability, ensuring that judges remain answerable to the electorate at regular intervals, thus potentially increasing civic engagement in the electoral process.

Summary

House Bill 0045, titled 'Justice Court Judge Elections Amendments', primarily aims to amend the procedures and requirements surrounding retention elections for justice court judges in Utah. The bill establishes that each justice or judge of a court of record who wishes to retain their position must file a declaration of candidacy within a specified time frame and pay a corresponding fee. This amendment is a response to the evolving needs for clearer processes regarding judicial retention, enhancing transparency for voters who are asked to determine judicial qualifications every few years.

Sentiment

Feedback from legislators regarding HB 0045 has generally been favorable, with a consensus on the need to improve the judicial retention election process. This bill was passed unanimously in the Senate, indicating strong bipartisan support for its objectives. However, there is a recognition of the need for careful implementation to maintain the integrity of the election process and to ensure that voters have sufficient information about judicial candidates during elections.

Contention

While the bill has garnered notable support, some concerns were raised regarding the potential for judicial roles becoming too politicized due to increased visibility in retention elections. Critics express that frequent elections could subject judges to external pressures from political organizations and lobbyists, potentially compromising judicial independence. However, supporters argue that voter oversight is essential for accountability and that the established procedural frameworks will help mitigate these risks.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

UT HB0451

Judicial Election Amendments

UT SB42

Provide for the partisan election of judges and justices

UT SB0025

Election of Lake County superior court judges.

UT SB0017

Election of Lake County superior court judges.

UT HB0294

Election Code Amendments

UT HB1255

Courts – Justices and Judges – Selection and Retention

UT HB48

Courts - Justices and Judges - Selection and Retention

UT SB0147

Election of Lake County superior court judges.

UT HB0216

Business and Chancery Court Amendments

UT SB851

A Joint Resolution proposing integrated amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, further providing for election of justices, judges and justices of the peace and vacancies and for tenure of justices, judges and justices of the peace.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.