Utah 2022 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0063

Introduced
1/18/22  
Refer
2/4/22  
Report Pass
2/16/22  
Engrossed
2/18/22  
Refer
2/22/22  
Report Pass
2/24/22  
Enrolled
3/10/22  

Caption

Covid-19 Vaccine Exemptions

Impact

The legislation directly affects workplace standards by instituting employee rights concerning vaccination status and related employment actions. Specifically, it restricts employers from taking adverse actions against employees based on their COVID-19 vaccination status, thereby enhancing protections for those choosing not to vaccinate for valid reasons. Additionally, the bill limits how employers can manage and retain records associated with vaccination proof and COVID-19 testing results.

Summary

House Bill 0063, also known as the COVID-19 Vaccine Exemptions bill, was introduced to amend existing laws regarding COVID-19 vaccination requirements in the workplace. The bill mandates that employers must exempt employees or prospective employees from mandatory vaccination if they provide evidence, such as a doctor's note, indicating prior COVID-19 infection or a statement of personal beliefs against vaccination. This legislation reflects an ongoing shift in workplace policies concerning health safety and personal rights amidst the pandemic.

Sentiment

The reception of HB 0063 has produced a mixed sentiment among legislators and the public. Proponents argue that the bill safeguards individual rights, allowing for personal freedom and health choice in the face of mandatory health policies. Conversely, detractors express concerns that such exemptions could undermine public health efforts to control the pandemic and propose challenges to ensuring workplace safety, with some arguing that it could lead to a patchwork of compliance across businesses, complicating enforcement and health protection efforts.

Contention

Key points of contention within the discussions surrounding HB 0063 include the balance between public health mandates and individual freedoms. Supporters appreciate the focus on personal choice and religious rights, while opponents warn that the bill may dilute necessary health safeguards in the workplace and could foster an environment of continued virus transmission. Furthermore, debate ensued over the provisions related to recordkeeping, as critics argue that limitations on an employer's ability to maintain vaccination records could lead to complications in managing workplace health protocols.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

OH HB398

Prohibit employers from seeking wage or salary history

WI AB612

Waivers from workplace immunization requirements.

WI SB921

Waivers from workplace immunization requirements.

AZ HB2912

Employment; employee salary

LA HB340

Creates the Personal Online Account Privacy Protection Act (EN NO IMPACT GF EX See Note)

NJ A759

Requires certain NJ Transit Corporation employees to undergo criminal history background checks and wear photo identification.

NJ A1614

Requires certain NJ Transit Corporation employees to undergo criminal history background checks and wear photo identification.

WI SB577

Prohibiting an employer from relying on information about a prospective employee's compensation when making employment decisions or inquiring about a prospective employee's compensation and from restricting an employee's right to disclose compensation information, allowing actions in circuit court, and providing a penalty. (FE)