If enacted, HB 0084 would significantly alter the enforcement landscape for child support, thereby providing custodial parents with longer periods to collect owed support. This change aims to reduce the burden on families that may rely on back child support payments for sustenance. Additionally, the bill addresses potential retroactivity, ensuring that past judgments are addressed under this extended timeline without disadvantaging families who have historically been unable to recover owed support.
Summary
House Bill 0084, also known as the Child Support Statute of Limitations bill, seeks to amend the current statute of limitations governing child support orders and judgments for past due support in the state of Utah. The bill proposes an extension of the enforcement period for child support orders to a maximum of 12 years after the youngest child reaches the age of 18, while also allowing judgments for past due support to endure for eight years from their entry date. The intent is to ensure that children are supported adequately without the constraints of a restrictive time frame for payment collection.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the bill appears generally favorable, especially among those advocating for children's rights and familial support. Supporters believe that the extension of the statute of limitations is a necessary adjustment to current laws, as it aligns with the need for ongoing financial support for children post-separation of the parents. However, concerns were raised regarding the balance between ensuring financial security for children and the potential burden this extended timeline may impose on non-custodial parents, who may find it increasingly challenging to settle longstanding obligations.
Contention
Notable points of contention include discussions about the bill's implications for non-custodial parents who may face increased challenges and prolonged obligations due to the extended periods for enforcement. Critics argue that while it is essential to support custodial parents and their children, the bill may overlook the rights and circumstances of non-custodial parents who might struggle to meet extended obligations. This adds a layer of complexity that stakeholders will need to navigate as the bill moves forward.