Utah 2022 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0209

Introduced
1/21/22  
Refer
2/7/22  
Report Pass
2/22/22  
Engrossed
2/23/22  
Refer
2/24/22  
Report Pass
2/28/22  
Enrolled
3/11/22  

Caption

Federalism Commission Amendments

Impact

The amendments proposed in HB 209 intend to strengthen the state's ability to scrutinize federal laws that may impose on the powers of the state. By formally empowering the commission to evaluate the legality of federal laws and their implications on state governance, the bill aims to prevent federal overreach and protect the unique interests of Utah residents. It reflects a broader push within certain state legislatures to assert local control over federal mandates, enhancing the dialogue between state and federal authorities.

Summary

House Bill 209, titled 'Federalism Commission Amendments', focuses on enhancing the oversight and evaluation capabilities of the Federalism Commission regarding federal laws. The bill empowers the commission to assess whether federal laws adhere to the principles of federalism as outlined in the U.S. Constitution. This includes the ability to contract with Utah institutions of higher education to facilitate thorough analyses of potentially conflicting federal legislation, ensuring state sovereignty and legislative compliance.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 209 appears to be largely supportive among legislators who prioritize state rights and the principles of federalism. Advocates argue that the bill is essential for maintaining a check on federal authority, asserting that it reflects a commitment to protecting the autonomy of states within the federation. Conversely, critics may view it as unnecessary legislative duplication, expressing concerns about execution and potential overextension of state powers at the expense of federal authority.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance of power between state and federal governments, particularly regarding how far a state should go in opposing federal regulations. The bill's emphasis on state evaluation of federal laws sparks debate over the interpretation of constitutional rights, such as the Tenth Amendment. Opponents of the bill might argue that this reinforces a divisive view of governance that could undermine federal agencies designed to implement nationwide standards and protections.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MS HB1356

"Mississippi Founding Principle Act"; enact to require social studies curriculum to provide instruction on founding documents and principles.

HI HB340

Proposing An Amendment To The Constitution Of The State Of Hawaii To Require The Judicial Selection Commission To Be Guided By Principles Of Merit In The Selection Of Judicial Nominations And The Retention Of Judges And Justices.

MI HR0043

A resolution to support the Obergefell decision and to reaffirm the definition of marriage as put forth by the founding principles including the separation of church and state.

MI HR0132

A resolution to declare September 11-17, 2023, as Patriot Week in the state of Michigan.

CA ACA16

Environmental rights.

MS HB537

Civics; require State Board of Education to develop curriculum for public middle and high school students.

MS HB596

Civics; require State Board of Education to develop curriculum for public middle and high school students.

MS HB1088

Civics; require State Board of Education to develop curriculum for public middle and high school students.