Utah 2022 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0235

Introduced
1/27/22  
Refer
2/2/22  
Report Pass
2/4/22  
Engrossed
2/14/22  
Refer
2/15/22  
Report Pass
2/24/22  
Enrolled
3/10/22  

Caption

Speed Limit Designation Amendments

Impact

The enactment of HB 235 alters existing laws relating to speed limit establishment, promoting a more decentralized approach where local governments can exercise greater control over speed regulations. By amending Utah Code Sections 41-6a-602 and 41-6a-603, the bill alleviates the bureaucratic burden that municipalities faced in the past, which may encourage a more responsive traffic management system that can be shaped by specific local conditions. However, this change raises concerns over uniformity in traffic regulations across the state.

Summary

House Bill 235, known as the Speed Limit Designation Amendments, introduces significant changes to the process by which counties and municipalities can establish speed limits on highways. This bill streamlines regulations by allowing local governments to set speed limits without needing to conduct a traffic engineering and safety study. This modification aims to provide more autonomy to local entities while potentially expediting the implementation of speed limits that meet their unique safety and traffic conditions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 235 appears to be cautiously optimistic among local government advocates who see the bill as a step towards empowering municipalities. Proponents argue that the ability to adjust speed limits promptly based on local assessments can enhance roadway safety and reduce accidents. Conversely, there are reservations from safety advocacy groups who worry that bypassing established safety studies could lead to poorly justified speed limits, potentially compromising public safety.

Contention

Notably, one point of contention is the balance between local control and the potential for inconsistent traffic regulations statewide. Critics argue that while the intent to expedite speed limit adjustments is commendable, the absence of traffic studies may lead to arbitrary speed limits that might not be adequately configured for safety. The debate highlights an ongoing dialogue regarding the effectiveness of local governance versus the necessity of standardized safety procedures in traffic regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

UT SB0053

Driver Speeding Amendments

UT HB0225

School Zone Speeding Amendments

UT SB0153

Idling Amendments

UT SB0195

Transportation Amendments

UT HB0407

Mini-motorcycle Amendments

UT HB0190

Motorcycle Amendments

UT HB0201

Traffic Enforcement Amendments

UT H0657

Enforcement of School Zone Speed Limits

UT S629

Requires posted speed limit on certain limited access highways be based on speed at which 85 percent of vehicles are traveling; designated as Speed Limit Sanity Act.

UT S1652

Requires posted speed limit on certain limited access highways be based on speed at which 85 percent of vehicles are traveling; designated as Speed Limit Sanity Act.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.