Utah 2022 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0269

Introduced

1/31/22

Refer

2/9/22

Report Pass

2/15/22

Engrossed

2/18/22

Refer

2/22/22

Report Pass

3/1/22

Enrolled

3/10/22

Passed

3/21/22

Caption

Capital Assets Related to Water

Impact

The bill impacts current state law by requiring modifications to how existing water and wastewater service providers operate in terms of asset management. Specifically, it necessitates rulemaking to establish elements of management plans, participation in surveys administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the provision of data regarding infrastructure needs. By doing so, it aims to enhance the accountability and efficiency of water service providers and ensure they are better prepared to maintain and upgrade their systems.

Summary

House Bill 269 focuses on the management of capital assets related to water and wastewater services in Utah. The bill mandates that wastewater and water service providers must develop capital asset management plans in order to qualify for state or federal funding. This legislation is intended to improve the infrastructure supporting water services by ensuring that providers have a structured approach to managing their resources effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 269 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among legislators focused on infrastructure improvement and water quality. Proponents argue that the bill promotes better resource management and can potentially lead to significant improvements in water service reliability. However, some concerns may arise from service providers regarding the feasibility and resource allocation required to implement the mandated capital asset management plans.

Contention

While the bill is largely seen as beneficial for state water management, there may be points of contention regarding the additional responsibilities placed on service providers. Critics could argue that imposing these requirements may increase operational costs and require additional staffing, particularly for smaller providers. Additionally, the enforcement of compliance through state and federal funding conditions may raise questions about the balance between state oversight and local autonomy in managing public resources.