Utah 2022 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0308

Introduced
2/3/22  
Refer
2/14/22  
Report Pass
3/2/22  

Caption

Prescription Drug Amendments

Impact

The bill impacts state laws by establishing new prohibitions against certain practices by PBMs regarding 340B entities. It aims to ensure that pharmacies are not unfairly penalized or charged extra fees based on their participation in the 340B program. Further, it seeks to protect those entities from discriminatory practices in contracting and reimbursement that could arise due to their 340B status. This may lead to increased compliance costs for PBMs, who will need to amend their contracting practices to adhere to the new stipulations outlined in the bill.

Summary

House Bill 0308, known as the Prescription Drug Amendments, aims to amend and clarify existing provisions related to drug pricing, specifically impacting how pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) interact with pharmacies that participate in the 340B Drug Pricing Program. One of the key changes introduced by the bill is the prohibition of PBMs from varying reimbursement amounts based on whether a drug is classified as a 340B drug or whether the pharmacy is a 340B entity. This could enhance access to affordable medications for certain entities that qualify under the 340B program, thus supporting the financial sustainability of these health care providers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 0308 appears to be largely positive among supporters, who see it as a necessary measure to address the inequities in drug pricing and to facilitate easier access to medications for patients relying on 340B entities. However, there are concerns among critics regarding the bill's potential impact on the overall administrative operations of PBMs, who are often seen as vital players in managing drug costs and pricing structures within healthcare markets.

Contention

Despite the broad support for the intentions of HB 0308, notable points of contention exist. Opponents argue that the constraints on PBMs might lead to unintended consequences, such as higher overall costs for drug management or limitations on their ability to negotiate better prices. Critics also worry that while the bill aims to improve access to medications, it might inadvertently disrupt the functioning of the Medicaid program as certain provisions do not apply to drugs reimbursed by Medicaid. This dual focus on both 340B compliance and cost management has resulted in a nuanced debate regarding the bill's future.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB913

Pharmacy benefit managers.

CA SB362

Chain community pharmacies: quotas.

LA HB432

Provides for the regulation of pharmacy services administrative organizations (OR +$88,000 SG EX See Note)

MS HB1125

Pharmacy services; prohibit insurers and PBMs from requiring persons to obtain exclusively through pharmacies that they own.

LA HB387

Provides for the regulation of pharmacy services administrative organizations

CA AB401

Pharmacy: remote dispensing site pharmacy: telepharmacy: shared clinic office space.

AR SB593

To Amend The Arkansas Pharmacy Benefits Manager Licensure Act; And To Create The Pharmacy Services Administrative Organization Act.

CA AB690

Pharmacies: relocation: remote dispensing site pharmacy: pharmacy technician: qualifications.