Utah 2022 Regular Session

Utah Senate Bill SB0170

Introduced
2/3/22  
Refer
2/3/22  
Refer
2/3/22  
Report Pass
2/7/22  
Engrossed
2/8/22  
Refer
2/9/22  
Report Pass
2/10/22  
Enrolled
2/11/22  

Caption

Election Schedule Amendments

Impact

This bill impacts existing state laws by amending sections of the Utah Code that govern elections, particularly how candidates declare their intentions to run and the residency requirements associated with specific offices. By implementing these amendments, SB170 can help ensure a more efficient election management process. For example, candidates will have clearer timelines relating to their filings which could potentially increase participation rates among political hopefuls.

Summary

Senate Bill 170, known as the Election Schedule Amendments, seeks to modify several provisions related to the election process in Utah. The bill primarily changes deadlines for political parties to notify elections officials, clarifies the residency requirements for candidates, and amends the period for filing declarations of candidacy along with the notice to gather signatures to qualify for the ballot. These changes aim to streamline the election process and improve the procedural clarity for both candidates and election officials.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB170 seems to be cautiously optimistic, with many viewing it as a necessary update to existing election protocols. Supporters argue that these modifications will facilitate smoother elections and provide necessary clarity in the candidacy process. However, there might be some apprehension regarding the impacts of these changes on smaller political parties or independent candidates who may find the signature-gathering process more challenging under the new regulations.

Contention

There could be points of contention among stakeholders, especially regarding the clarity of residency requirements for candidates and how that might affect their eligibility. While the bill aims to clarify these issues, some may argue that the adjustments could inadvertently suppress candidacies if the parameters become too stringent. Additionally, the implications for smaller parties in terms of deadlines and signature requirements might raise questions about equitable access to the ballot.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

UT HB0193

Ballot Signature Amendments

UT HB0374

Signature Collection Amendments

UT SB0053

Election Code Amendments

UT HB0232

Candidate Nomination Procedures Amendments

UT SB0054

Appearance of Candidate Name on Ballot

UT HB0393

Primary Ballot Requirements

UT SB0037

Election Law Revisions

UT HB0457

Signature Verification Amendments