Utah 2023 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0098

Introduced
1/17/23  
Refer
1/18/23  
Report Pass
1/31/23  
Engrossed
2/2/23  
Refer
2/3/23  
Report Pass
2/7/23  
Enrolled
3/9/23  

Caption

Process Server Amendments

Impact

The impact of HB 0098 is significant on state laws related to the qualifications of process servers. By including special function officers among those authorized to serve process under certain conditions, the bill aims to streamline the process and enhance safety for those involved. There are specific provisions requiring process servers, particularly private investigators, to have visible identification and to communicate their role clearly when serving documents. This amendment includes technical and conforming changes to existing state laws, ensuring they are updated to reflect modern legal practices.

Summary

House Bill 0098, known as the Process Server Amendments, seeks to amend the qualifications required for individuals serving court documents in Utah. The bill primarily allows certain special function officers to serve legal documents when circumstances necessitate the authorized use of force or when a breach of peace is imminent. This change reflects a broader intent to ensure that process serving remains effective under potentially volatile conditions and maintains the integrity of the legal process.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 0098 has largely been positive among legal professionals and law enforcement. Advocates argue that the amendments are necessary for allowing trained officers to respond effectively in situations where serving documents might create a risk of conflict. However, there remains a cautious approach to ensure that the authority is not misused. Overall, the sentiment reflects a consensus on improving the safety and efficiency of the process service without drastically altering the existing framework.

Contention

One notable area of contention regarding HB 0098 is the balance between ensuring safety and regulating the authority of process servers. While proponents support the inclusion of special function officers, there are concerns about overseeing the actions of these officers to prevent any misuse of power, especially in sensitive situations. Moreover, opposition may arise from within the community concerned about the implications of escalating force in civil matters. This bill introduces a nuanced conversation about the responsibilities and training required for those granted the authority to serve legal documents, with a focus on public trust and legal accountability.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A813

Codifies AG directive concerning criminal investigations of law enforcement use-of-force and in-custody deaths.

NJ S1093

Codifies AG directive concerning criminal investigations of law enforcement use-of-force and in-custody deaths.

CA AB31

Whistleblowers: California State Auditor.

CA AB718

Peace officers: investigations of misconduct.

MS SB2036

DA criminal investigators; revise allocation and compensation of.

CA AB1179

Child custody: allegations of abuse: report.

CA AB1911

Residential care facilities: complaints.

CA SB1069

State prisons: Office of the Inspector General.