Utah 2023 Regular Session

Utah Senate Bill SB0175

Introduced
2/6/23  
Refer
2/6/23  
Report Pass
2/15/23  
Engrossed
2/23/23  
Refer
2/27/23  
Report Pass
2/28/23  
Report Pass
3/2/23  
Report Pass
3/2/23  
Report Pass
3/2/23  
Enrolled
3/9/23  

Caption

Rural Transportation Infrastructure Fund

Impact

The impact of SB0175 is significant as it makes considerable adjustments to State transportation funding by designating specific revenues from vehicle registration fees to the newly created Rural Transportation Infrastructure Fund. This fund will be administered by the Department of Transportation and is set to distribute financial resources to qualifying counties and municipalities, thereby providing a structured approach to improving rural infrastructure. It emphasizes the necessity for ongoing appropriations and revenue adjustments starting January 1, 2024, ensuring that funding grows with inflation based on the Consumer Price Index.

Summary

SB0175 establishes the Rural Transportation Infrastructure Fund, specifically aimed at enhancing highway projects across certain rural cities, towns, and counties in Utah. The bill facilitates the creation of this fund through a portion of vehicle registration fees, ensuring that these funds are allocated for road improvements and infrastructure enhancements in designated rural areas, thereby promoting better connectivity and safety on rural roads.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB0175 appears to be positive among various legislators and stakeholders advocating for rural development and infrastructure improvement. Supporters have expressed enthusiasm regarding the potential for enhanced transportation capabilities and the benefits derived from such investments in rural settings. However, there remains a cautious outlook on how well the distribution mechanisms will work and whether certain rural localities will benefit equitably from the fund.

Contention

While there is broad support for improving rural transportation infrastructure, some points of contention may arise regarding the fund's management, allocation of resources, and how qualifying criteria for rural counties and municipalities are determined. Critics may raise concerns about whether smaller or less populous counties will be adequately represented in the funding distribution compared to larger areas. Additionally, there are questions regarding the sufficiency of funding to meet all anticipated infrastructure needs in these rural localities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NM HB42

Public Project Revolving Fund Projects

HI SB965

Relating To Green Transportation Infrastructure.

HI HB1278

Relating To Green Transportation Infrastructure.

HI HB1278

Relating To Green Transportation Infrastructure.

CA SB538

Department of Transportation: Chief Advisor on Bicycling and Active Transportation.

HI SB965

Relating To Green Transportation Infrastructure.

CA AB7

Transportation: planning: project selection processes.

HI SB3274

Relating To Transportation.