Utah 2024 Regular Session

Utah Senate Bill SB0095

Introduced
1/16/24  
Refer
1/17/24  
Report Pass
1/24/24  
Engrossed
1/31/24  
Refer
2/6/24  
Report Pass
2/23/24  
Enrolled
3/12/24  
Enrolled
3/13/24  

Caption

Domestic Relations Recodification

Impact

The implications of SB0095 are significant as it intends to create a more coherent legal structure for handling domestic relations. Among its provisions, the bill clarifies the requirements for child support orders, the process of validating marriages, and what constitutes a substantial change in circumstances for alimony modification. These updates can potentially streamline processes in family law courts and reduce the confusion that arises from outdated or ambiguous statutes, representing a modernization of Utah's legal approach to domestic relations and family law.

Summary

SB0095, known as the Domestic Relations Recodification bill, aims to overhaul various statutes related to domestic relations within the state. This legislation recodifies several parts of the Utah Code, moving existing regulations around marriage, divorce, and child support under a more unified framework. Notably, this bill consolidates multiple titles into the newly defined Utah Domestic Relations Code, making it easier to navigate and enforce. Additionally, it introduces several clarifying provisions regarding joint debts during divorce, marriage validations, and the rights and obligations that arise during marriage and in cases of dissolution.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB0095 appears to be generally positive, with recognition of the need for modernizing and simplifying the existing legal landscape. Supporters argue that this bill addresses longstanding issues of clarity and accessibility in family law, which can greatly benefit individuals navigating divorce and child custody disputes. However, there may be voices of contention surrounding specific provisions, such as validation clauses for interracial and same-sex marriages, which highlight societal concerns and the interpretation of legal protections.

Contention

Despite the broad support for the recodification, there are points of contention particularly regarding how certain provisions may affect specific demographic groups. Concerns have been raised regarding the adequacy of protections for marginalized communities, especially in terms of marriage validation amidst changing societal norms. Additionally, the implications for child support calculations could lead to debates about equity and fairness in determining obligations depending on custody arrangements which may vary significantly among parents.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

UT SB0119

Domestic Relations Recodification

CA AB1817

Family law omnibus.

MS HB1117

Father's child support; authorize retroactive payments for mother's prenatal and post-natal expenses.

MS HB318

"Fatherhood begins at Conception Act"; create.

MS HB880

"Fatherhood begins at Conception Act"; create.

MS HB50

Child support for pregnant women; provide authority to allow court to order.

MS HB320

Child support for pregnant women; provide authority to allow court to order.

RI S2506

Divorce And Separation