Utah 2025 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0026

Introduced
1/21/25  
Engrossed
1/22/25  
Refer
1/24/25  
Report Pass
1/30/25  
Enrolled
3/7/25  

Caption

Road Jurisdiction Amendments

Impact

The passage of HB 0026 is expected to have implications for state transportation policies and may alter local governance regarding road maintenance and management. By modifying the designation of specific routes, the bill signifies a shift in how certain roads are prioritized within the state highway system. This could potentially lead to adjustments in funding and maintenance responsibilities, thereby influencing local government budgets and their capabilities to manage road infrastructure effectively.

Summary

House Bill 0026, titled the Road Jurisdiction Amendments, is designed to update and modify the Designation of State Highways Act in Utah. The bill specifically focuses on removing certain roads from the classification of state highways and clarifying the descriptions of existing state highways. This reflects an ongoing effort by the Utah Legislature to adapt the highway system in response to changing transportation needs and community requirements. It aims to streamline and clarify the designation of roads within the state’s jurisdiction, enhancing transportation management.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be largely supportive, especially among those advocating for clearer transportation management. Supporters believe that these amendments can lead to improved efficiency in road management by reducing ambiguity in jurisdictional responsibilities. However, there might be concerns among local governments regarding the removal of specific roads from state designation, as this might limit their access to state funding for road improvements.

Contention

Notable points of contention around HB 0026 could include debates over which roads should be removed from state highway status, particularly those that may be vital to local communities. There's often a balance to be struck between state-level oversight and local government priorities, which can create friction among stakeholders. As the bill progresses, discussions are likely to emerge regarding the implications for road maintenance funding and whether local interests will be adequately represented.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MS SB2012

State highway system; include Old State Highways 6 and 9 in Pontotoc County in.

OR SB418

Relating to TriMet.

TX SB2530

Relating to the creation of the Van Alstyne Municipal Utility District No. 2 of Collin County; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.

TX HB4627

Relating to the creation of certain municipal utility districts; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.

TX SB1247

Relating to the creation of Jefferson County Management District No. 1; providing authority to impose an assessment, impose a tax, and issue bonds.

TX HB2296

Relating to the creation of Jefferson County Management District No. 1; providing authority to impose an assessment, impose a tax, and issue bonds.

TX HB5320

Relating to the creation of the Montgomery County Municipal Utility District No. 227; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.

TX HB4192

Relating to the creation of Simonton Management District No. 1; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, or taxes.