Utah 2025 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0288

Introduced
1/22/25  
Refer
1/30/25  

Caption

Health Care Malpractice Amendments

Impact

The bill modifies the limitations on awards for noneconomic damages in malpractice cases. As of May 15, 2025, the maximum amount for noneconomic losses will increase to $950,000, with adjustments for inflation occurring annually. This change not only inflates the maximum award amounts but also reflects an understanding of the increasing costs associated with malpractice claims and the need for compensation that truly reflects the harm caused to patients. The provision of adjusting these amounts for inflation over time further indicates an effort to keep pace with economic realities that can affect plaintiffs' recovery amounts.

Summary

House Bill 0288, known as the Health Care Malpractice Amendments, aims to reform several aspects of malpractice law in Utah. Key provisions of this bill extend the statute of limitations for health care malpractice actions from two years to four years after the discovery of the injury, allowing patients more time to file claims. This change is significant as it acknowledges the complexities in often delayed recognitions of malpractice and seeks to accommodate patient interests in seeking legal redress. The bill also stipulates that if a notice of intent is filed to allocate fault to a non-party health care provider, it's considered as discovery of injury, further extending the opportunity for patients to seek compensation.

Contention

Moreover, the legislation expands the meaning of 'collateral source', allowing for broader definitions of compensation sources available to the plaintiff. However, this has raised concerns among some healthcare providers and insurers who fear it may lead to increased litigation costs. The implications of these changes could be significant in the context of the wider health care landscape, potentially influencing both how malpractice claims are handled and the overall costs associated with medical malpractice insurance. Critics argue that this shift might encourage an uptick in lawsuits, while proponents see it as a necessary measure to protect patients' rights and ensure fair compensation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

UT SB0335

Medical Malpractice Revisions

UT HB0503

Medical Malpractice Modifications

RI H5903

Repeals the collateral source rule in medical malpractice actions.

CA SB832

State government.

IL SB2627

PUNITIVE DAMAGES-LEGAL MALPRAC

VA SB892

Medical malpractice; certification of expert witness, written opinion.

IL HB1466

CIV PRO-AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT

IL SB1352

CIV PRO-AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT