Utah 2025 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0299

Introduced
1/23/25  
Refer
2/3/25  
Report Pass
2/13/25  
Engrossed
2/19/25  
Refer
2/21/25  
Report Pass
2/28/25  

Caption

Election Code Time Computation Revisions

Impact

The amendments included in HB 299 are intended to streamline and clarify voter engagement and election administration in Utah. By establishing clear definitions and timelines, the bill seeks to reduce confusion and enhance compliance among election officials. Specifically, these changes could improve voter registration processes and the management of statewide elections, ultimately aiming for greater efficiency and accuracy in election day operations.

Summary

House Bill 299, titled 'Election Code Time Computation Revisions', proposes several amendments to the Election Code to clarify and revise the computation of deadlines relating to various election processes. Key provisions include designating Election Day and Easter Sunday as legal holidays, thus impacting when certain election-related actions must occur. The bill aims to establish coordination with other legislation concerning electoral processes to create a more structured framework for administering elections.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be generally positive among proponents, who argue that the clarifications provided in HB 299 are crucial for maintaining the integrity of elections and ensuring that all voters are treated fairly and legally. However, there are concerns raised by some stakeholders about the implications of designating additional holidays, particularly regarding operational costs and disruptions. Overall, while the sentiment leans towards approval, there are nuanced criticisms that highlight the potential challenges of implementation.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 299 revolve around the addition of legal holidays, which some argue could lead to logistical complications or increased costs for election administration. Additionally, the coordination clauses included in the bill that link its provisions to other bills (such as H.B. 351 and S.B. 259) may raise questions about the legislative process and effective execution. Stakeholders will likely continue to debate the long-term impacts of such changes on the state's electoral landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

UT SB0164

Modifications to Election Law

UT HB0369

Elections Office

UT HB0170

Initiatives and Referenda Amendments

UT HB0165

Process for Submitting Nonbinding Opinion Question

UT HB0232

Candidate Nomination Procedures Amendments

UT SB0218

Voter Information Amendments

UT HB0408

School Board Referendum Amendments

UT HB0101

Ballot Proposition Amendments