Utah 2025 Regular Session

Utah Senate Bill SB0126

Introduced
1/21/25  
Refer
1/30/25  
Report Pass
2/6/25  
Engrossed
2/24/25  
Refer
2/26/25  
Report Pass
2/28/25  

Caption

Airborne Chemicals Amendments

Impact

The implications of this bill extend to existing environmental regulations by formally categorizing solar geoengineering as an actionable item under state law. It provides a framework for individuals to report any suspected activities related to solar geoengineering, requiring the Department of Transportation to relay credible reports to the Attorney General's office. By establishing legal definitions and the prohibition of certain aerial practices, the bill aims to mitigate environmental risks associated with unregulated geoengineering.

Summary

Senate Bill 126, known as the Airborne Chemicals Amendments, focuses on regulating the release of airborne chemicals specifically related to solar geoengineering activities. The bill defines key terms, particularly highlighting solar geoengineering as the process of modifying the Earth's atmosphere to manage solar radiation. It prohibits any aircraft from being used with the intent to conduct such geoengineering efforts within the state of Utah.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 126 appears to be cautiously supportive, particularly among environmental advocates who welcome stricter regulations on solar geoengineering. However, concerns may arise regarding the practical enforcement of such prohibitions, as well as the bill's implications for scientific research and innovation in atmospheric science. The need for public transparency, coupled with the potential legal consequences for violators, suggests a concerted effort to balance environmental protection with the potential benefits of such technologies.

Contention

One notable point of contention discussed is the classification and regulation of solar geoengineering itself. Critics may argue that the bill could stifle research initiatives or hinder beneficial technologies that could be developed under carefully controlled conditions. The bill's penalties, ranging from class A misdemeanors for violations to implementation challenges in identifying specific geoengineering acts, will likely generate discussions about the extent of regulation and the role of scientific governance in atmospheric management.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ HB2056

Geoengineering; prohibition

WV SB699

Protecting environment and humans from geo-engineering experiments

ME LD825

An Act to Prohibit Geoengineering, Including the Use of Cloud Seeding, Weather Modification, Excessive Radio Waves and Microwave Radiation

ME LD499

An Act to Prohibit Geoengineering

WY HB0208

Atmospheric geoengineering prohibition.

AZ SB1432

Prohibition; geoengineering

NH HB764

Prohibiting the intentional release of polluting emissions, including cloud seeding, weather modification, excessive electromagnetic radio frequency, and microwave radiation and making penalties for violation of such prohibition.

MS SB2013

Environmental protection; prohibit chemtrails.