Utah 2026 Regular Session

Utah House Bill HB0527

Introduced
2/9/26  
Refer
2/19/26  
Report Pass
2/25/26  
Engrossed
2/27/26  
Refer
2/27/26  
Report Pass
3/2/26  
Enrolled
3/12/26  

Caption

Pharmacy Pricing Amendments

Impact

The legislation is expected to have significant implications on how pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) operate, particularly regarding their pricing strategies and oversight mechanisms. By mandating that PBMs adhere to stringent guidelines for determining maximum allowable costs, the bill aims to enhance price transparency. Additionally, the appeals process established in this bill is designed to empower pharmacies to contest reimbursement rates that they deem unfair, thus encouraging a fairer pricing environment for consumers.

Summary

House Bill 0527, titled 'Pharmacy Pricing Amendments', focuses on amending provisions related to pharmacy benefits within the state. The bill sets forth definitions and outlines stipulations regarding drug maximum allowable costs, appeals processes for pharmacies, and penalties for violations. Furthermore, it provides the Insurance Department with the authority to enact administrative rules pertinent to these provisions. The intent is to streamline the pharmacy benefit management process, potentially improving drug access and pricing for pharmacies and their clients.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 0527 appears to be largely supportive among pharmacy stakeholders and advocates for cost transparency in prescription drug pricing. Proponents argue that the bill will lead to enhanced fairness and accountability in the pharmaceutical supply chain. However, there are concerns from some quarters about the administrative burdens placed on pharmacy benefit managers and potential pushback regarding regulatory compliance.

Contention

Points of contention related to HB 0527 primarily revolve around the administrative responsibilities imposed on PBMs and potential pushback from the pharmaceutical industry. Critics argue that the new regulations may lead to increased operational costs for PBMs, which could, in turn, be passed on to consumers. Additionally, there are concerns about how effectively the appeal processes will function and whether they will significantly benefit pharmacies without significant resistance from larger PBM entities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

UT HB0257

Pharmacy Benefit Amendments

UT SB0312

Pharmacy Practice Amendments

UT SB0069

Medication Amendments

UT HB0519

Health Care Access Amendments

UT HB0409

Medicaid Pharmacy Amendments

UT HB0333

Medications in Schools Amendments

UT HB0123

Pharmacy Accessibility Amendments

UT HB0495

Health Care Amendments

UT HB0068

Insurance Funds Amendments

UT SB0214

Health Insurance Coverage Amendments

Similar Bills

KS HB2551

Enacting the Kansas pharmacy services administrative organization act.

AR SB593

To Amend The Arkansas Pharmacy Benefits Manager Licensure Act; And To Create The Pharmacy Services Administrative Organization Act.

MS HB1125

Pharmacy services; prohibit insurers and PBMs from requiring persons to obtain exclusively through pharmacies that they own.

MS HB558

Pharmacy services; prohibit insurers and PBMs from requiring persons to obtain exclusively through pharmacies that they own.

NJ S2345

"Patient and Provider Protection Act."

AR SB475

To Establish The Pharmacy Services Administrative Organization Act; And To Regulate Pharmacy Services Administrative Organizations.

AZ HB2429

Pharmacy benefits; pharmacy management networks

AZ HB2813

pharmacy benefits; workers' compensation