Utah Senate Bill SB0244

Utah 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/4/26
• Refer: 2/4/26
• Report Pass: 2/17/26
• Engrossed: 2/27/26
• Refer: 3/2/26
• Report Pass: 3/3/26
• Enrolled: 3/10/26
• Passed: 3/19/26

Caption

Cardiac Emergency Response Plans in Schools

Summary

SB0244 proposes the establishment of required cardiac emergency response plans (CERPs) in schools across Utah. The bill mandates that each school within a local education agency (LEA) develop a plan that encompasses evidence-based practices for managing cardiovascular emergencies. This includes ensuring that automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are appropriately placed and maintained in schools and that designated staff members receive training in first aid and CPR, along with the usage of AEDs. The bill specifically targets high-needs schools to ensure they have the necessary resources and training to effectively respond to cardiac emergencies. The impact of SB0244 is significant, as it aims to enhance the safety and preparedness of schools in handling critical health emergencies. Should the bill be enacted, it will necessitate each school to integrate these plans by the 2026-2027 school year, leading to potentially faster response times for cardiac incidents on school grounds. The legislation provides for the distribution of $200,000 in grant funding to help support the implementation of these plans, especially in schools that demonstrate a strong need for resources to address these critical situations. The general sentiment surrounding SB0244 appears to be supportive, particularly among health advocates and education officials, who recognize the importance of equipping schools to deal with life-threatening emergencies. The training of staff and access to AEDs are seen as crucial components of fostering a safer school environment. On the other hand, concerns may arise regarding funding adequacy, training frequency, and the additional responsibilities placed on school staff, which could lead to debates about logistical feasibility. Notable points of contention include potential resistance from school boards regarding the financial implications of staff training and maintenance of AEDs. While proponents emphasize the life-saving potential of such measures, skeptics may voice concerns over the practicality of implementing these plans and the ongoing support required from the state, which echoes broader themes in education funding debates.