United States Constitution; application for a convention of the states.
Impact
If passed, HJR3 would enable an avenue for states to convene and discuss potential amendments to the Constitution, provided that two-thirds of state legislatures express similar applications. The proposed amendments, however, would be specifically restricted to the topics outlined in the resolution, ensuring that any alterations to the Bill of Rights are not considered under this process. This move represents a significant assertion of state sovereignty and could fundamentally alter the balance of power between state and federal governments.
Summary
HJR3 is a resolution proposed by the General Assembly of Virginia, calling for a convention of states under Article V of the United States Constitution. The primary purpose of this convention is to propose amendments aimed at imposing fiscal restraints on the federal government, limiting its power and jurisdiction, and establishing term limits for federal officials and members of Congress. The resolution emphasizes the role of state legislators as guardians against overreach by the federal government and seeks to address concerns about national debt and unconstitutional federal mandates.
Conclusion
HJR3 highlights a pivotal moment in the ongoing discourse surrounding federalism and the limits of government authority. The ability for states to call a convention could empower them to push back against perceived federal overreach, but it also opens up a pathway for significant constitutional changes. As the resolution proceeds through the legislative process, the discussions surrounding its implications will likely shape future political dialogues regarding state and federal relations.
Contention
The resolution may invoke considerable debate among legislators and constituents. Supporters argue that it is a necessary step to reclaim state authority and check the growing fiscal irresponsibility of the federal government. Conversely, critics express concern that a convention could lead to unforeseen changes beyond the intended scope and create the risk of undermining established constitutional protections. Other arguments stem from the fear of opening up the Constitution to potential amendments that may be deemed unfavorable to the rights of citizens.
A resolution recognizing the expiration of the Equal Rights Amendment proposed by Congress in March 1972, and observing that Congress has no authority to modify a resolution proposing a constitutional amendment after the amendment has been submitted to the States or after the amendment has expired.
RESCINDING ALL PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS OF THE ALABAMA LEGISLATURE WHICH REQUEST CONGRESS TO CALL A CONVENTION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.
RESCINDING ALL PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS OF THE ALABAMA LEGISLATURE WHICH REQUEST CONGRESS TO CALL A CONVENTION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.
Urging the Congress of the United States to propose and submit to the states for ratification a federal balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States and, in the event that Congress does not submit such an amendment on or before December 31, 2011, applying to Congress to call a convention for the specific and exclusive purpose of proposing an amendment to that constitution to provide, in the absence of a national emergency and on a two-thirds vote of Congress, for a federal balanced budget and requesting that the legislatures of each of the several states that compose the United States apply to Congress to call a convention to propose such an amendment.