Virginia 2022 Regular Session

Virginia Senate Bill SB90

Introduced
1/5/22  
Refer
1/5/22  
Report Pass
2/8/22  
Engrossed
2/14/22  
Refer
2/22/22  
Report Pass
3/2/22  
Engrossed
3/7/22  
Engrossed
3/8/22  
Enrolled
3/10/22  
Chaptered
4/5/22  

Caption

Breeders of dogs and cats for animal testing facilities; adoption of dogs and cats.

Impact

The impact of SB90 is significant in the realm of animal welfare as it holds breeders and testing facilities accountable for the animals in their care. By requiring these entities to adopt a certain protocol for animal care, the bill contributes to the larger objective of reducing unnecessary euthanizations and increasing the number of adoptions from facilities. The requirement to keep offers for release open for up to three weeks before any decision to euthanize also creates a critical window for intervention by animal rescue organizations and potential adopters.

Summary

SB90 amends the Code of Virginia to establish requirements regarding the adoption of dogs and cats by breeders and animal testing facilities. Specifically, the bill mandates that any breeder or testing facility that no longer requires a dog or cat must offer the animal for adoption through a releasing agency or develop an internal adoption program if they are operated by an institution of higher education. This legislation aims to ensure that animals not posing a health risk are provided with the opportunity for adoption rather than euthanization, promoting better animal welfare practices.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB90 appears to be generally positive among animal welfare advocates who see it as a progressive step towards responsible animal care management. Supporters view the bill as a necessary measure to protect lives and promote adoption, effectively countering the outdated practice of euthanizing healthy animals. However, there may be some contention among breeders and facilities regarding the operational implications and responsibilities imposed by the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the responsibilities placed on breeders and testing facilities, particularly around the development of adoption programs and the indefinite handling of animals no longer needed. Concerns may arise about the practical aspects of implementing such programs, including training, resources, and potential liabilities related to animal adoption. Additionally, the provisions protecting breeders and facilities from liability for any harm post-adoption could raise ethical questions among animal rights groups, emphasizing the ongoing debate around animal welfare and responsible breeding practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.