Constitutional amendment; local government, sale of property.
The passage of SJR3 is expected to affect state laws governing the management and sale of local governments' property. By establishing stricter requirements for the sale of public lands and the granting of franchises, the bill aims to protect these assets from potential misuse or mismanagement. Supporters argue that the involvement of the governing body in such sales ensures transparency and accountability in local governance, safeguarding public interests in the management of essential services and utilities.
SJR3 proposes an amendment to the Constitution of Virginia concerning the sale of property by local governments, specifically cities and towns. The bill seeks to amend Section 9 of Article VII to clarify the conditions under which local governments can sell or grant rights to public property. This includes provisions governing waterfronts, wharves, gas, water, and electric works, which can only be sold through an ordinance or resolution passed by a recorded affirmative vote of three-fourths of the governing body. The bill emphasizes the need for public engagement by requiring local governments to receive bids for franchises or leases longer than five years, except for certain exceptions such as trunk railways.
While the bill is aimed at enhancing local accountability, there may be contention around the need for such restrictions. Some argue that these amendments could hinder local governments' flexibility in responding to economic opportunities or emergencies. Moreover, there could be concerns about bureaucratic delays in decision-making, as requiring a supermajority vote might slow down processes that previously could be executed with a simple majority. This balance between oversight and operational efficiency could provoke debate among stakeholders in local governance and community service sectors.