Virginia House Bill HB2024

Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/10/23
• Refer: 1/10/23
• Report Pass: 2/3/23
• Engrossed: 2/6/23
• Refer: 2/8/23
• Report Pass: 2/15/23
• Report Pass: 2/16/23
• Enrolled: 2/24/23
• Chaptered: 5/12/23
• Passed: 5/12/23

Caption

Judges and magistrates, retired or active; personal information on the Internet, penalty.

Impact

If passed, HB 2024 would notably change the framework of personal data protection laws in Virginia. It establishes clear grounds under which public officials can request that their personal information be withheld from public dissemination, thereby enhancing their privacy and safety. This shift may result in fewer incidents of doxxing or other forms of intimidation against those in public service, particularly in sensitive judicial or law enforcement roles. The bill reflects a growing recognition of the risks associated with the online publication of personal information in an era where public officials face increasing levels of scrutiny and potential violation of their privacy.

Summary

House Bill 2024 seeks to amend existing Virginia laws concerning the publication of personal information related to public officials, particularly judges, magistrates, and law enforcement officers. The bill stipulates that such personal information may not be published on the internet if a court has prohibited its disclosure for safety reasons. This is intended to provide additional protection to public officials who may face threats or harassment due to their roles. The legislation aims to balance public interest with individual safety by introducing legal avenues through which officials can seek to restrict the sharing of their personal data online.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2024 tends to be supportive among lawmakers who prioritize the safety and security of public officials. Advocates argue that it is a necessary measure to protect those serving in high-risk positions from threats to their personal safety. However, there is also a cautionary perspective emphasizing the importance of transparency and public accountability, suggesting that overly restrictive measures could inadvertently shield public servants from scrutiny. This duality presents a complex landscape of opinions, with a clear divide between those prioritizing safety and those emphasizing the need for open governance.

Contention

The primary points of contention regarding HB 2024 revolve around the implications of restricting access to public information. Critics may voice concerns that limiting the publication of personal information could undermine public oversight and accountability of public officials. Discussions about the bill highlight the tension between ensuring the safety of individuals in sensitive positions and maintaining the public's right to information. The effectiveness of the proposed legal protections and their enforcement also emerge as significant aspects during deliberations on this piece of legislation.