Virginia House Bill HJR520

Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/10/23
• Refer: 1/10/23

Caption

Constitutional amendment; qualifications of voters and the right to vote (first reference).

Impact

The proposed amendment aims to clarify and modernize voter qualifications within Virginia’s legal framework. By addressing the treatment of individuals with felony convictions and mental incapacity, HJR520 seeks to enhance voter participation and ensure that the voting process reflects contemporary societal values regarding justice and rehabilitation. This bill is anticipated to have implications for how Virginia administers elections and manages the rights of reinstatement for former felons and individuals previously deemed incompetent.

Summary

HJR520 proposes an amendment to the Constitution of Virginia regarding voter qualifications and the fundamental right to vote. This amendment stipulates that every citizen of the United States, who is at least eighteen years old and meets certain residency requirements, shall have the right to vote. However, it specifies that individuals convicted of a felony will be disqualified from voting until their civil rights are restored, though they shall regain their voting rights automatically upon release from incarceration without the need for further action. Additionally, those adjudicated as mentally incompetent by a court will be deemed ineligible to vote until they are restored to competency.

Contention

There are notable discussions regarding the balance between safeguarding voting rights and ensuring the integrity of the electoral process. Advocates for HJR520 argue that restoring voting rights to individuals after serving their time supports reintegration into society and affirms the belief in second chances. Conversely, critics may raise concerns around public perception and the decision-making capacity of those previously adjudicated mentally incompetent, questioning if such modifications might open avenues for abuse. Balancing these perspectives presents a significant point of contention in the amendment's discussions.