Vehicles left on private property; public utility company service vehicles, removal or towing.
Impact
This legislation impacts the authority of local governments over vehicle regulation on private properties. It explicitly allows counties, cities, and towns to establish their own rules for the removal of abandoned vehicles, aiming to streamline the process and provide clarity in towing regulations. The bill reinforces that vehicles belonging to utility companies can remain on private property during service provision, which may help in maintaining essential services without interruptions. However, clear signage is required to inform property users of potential towing if vehicles are left unattended due to these new rules.
Summary
SB1051 amends §46.2-1215 of the Code of Virginia to prohibit leaving motor vehicles, trailers, or semitrailers on private property without the consent of the property owner. The bill allows local governing bodies to establish ordinances for the removal of vehicles left unattended for over 72 hours. These ordinances can include provisions for towing vehicles at the owner's expense and indemnification clauses for the local government regarding removal-related costs. Additionally, it introduces §46.2-1215.1, which provides conditions under which public utility company and broadband service provider vehicles can remain on private property without consent when they are providing service.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB1051 appears mixed. Supporters, mainly local governments, may appreciate the enhanced ability to manage parking and remove abandoned vehicles promptly while ensuring that utility services remain uninterrupted. However, there may be concerns among private property owners regarding the potential for misuse or overreach in towing practices. Advocates for property rights might argue that property owners should have more control over vehicles left on their land without the need to engage local government ordinances.
Contention
Notable contention around SB1051 lies in balancing public utility needs with property owner rights. Critics may be concerned that while the bill aims to facilitate vehicle removal and support utility services, it does not sufficiently protect the legitimate interests of property owners. The introduction of indemnification clauses could lead to disputes over costs incurred during vehicle removals and challenge the responsibilities and liabilities of local governments versus private property owners. Discussions about the effectiveness and fairness of the 72-hour limitation for vehicle towing also highlight tensions between public service necessities and individual rights.
To Increase The Sales And Use Tax Exemption For Used Motor Vehicles; And To Repeal The Special Rate Of Tax For Certain Used Motor Vehicles, Trailers, And Semitrailers.