Historic rehabilitation; increases maximum amount of tax credit, effective provision.
The proposed changes to the tax credit will likely have significant implications for historic preservation efforts throughout the state. By increasing the potential financial benefits from such rehabilitation projects, the bill could encourage more property owners and developers to invest in restoring historic buildings. This has the potential to lead to revitalization of historical districts and contribute to the overall economic landscape by attracting tourism and associated businesses. Furthermore, the bill aims to create a more favorable environment for public-private partnerships focused on the rehabilitation of historical structures, fostering collaboration that could lead to enhanced funding and resources available for such projects.
SB1066 aims to amend the historic rehabilitation tax credit available in Virginia, increasing the maximum available credit for taxpayers who incur eligible expenses for the restoration of certified historic structures. The bill proposes to amend existing provisions under §58.1-339.2 of the Code of Virginia, allowing for a significant increase in the tax credit amount from $5 million to $10 million for all taxpayers from taxable years beginning after January 1, 2023. This change is intended to incentivize the rehabilitation of historic properties, thus promoting the preservation of Virginia's cultural heritage while simultaneously fostering economic development through enhanced investment in historic structures.
General sentiment around SB1066 appears to be positive, particularly among proponents of historic preservation, local governments, and preservation organizations. Supporters view the increased tax credit as a crucial tool that will not only aid in the restoration of historic sites but also contribute to the economic vitality of communities through increased property values and tourism. However, there may be concerns from fiscal conservatives regarding the potential impact on state revenue, particularly how the implementation of the increased tax credits will be accounted for in the state's budget, which could lead to debates about budget priorities and the balance between preserving culture and managing fiscal responsibility.
Notable points of contention include the need for fiscal accountability and the expectation that any revenue changes resulting from the implementation of the bill should be properly accounted for. Some legislators may question whether the anticipated benefits will outweigh potential revenue losses. Moreover, there is dialogue around ensuring that the restoration of historic buildings is conducted to high standards that align with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, to ensure that the integrity of these structures is maintained.