Virginia 2024 Regular Session

Virginia House Bill HB697

Introduced
1/9/24  
Refer
1/9/24  
Report Pass
2/2/24  
Engrossed
2/7/24  

Caption

Synthetic media; use in furtherance of crimes involving fraud, etc., report.

Impact

The introduction of HB 697 will amend existing laws in Virginia by adding a clear definition of synthetic media and establishing explicit penalties for its misuse. The bill is designed to combat the rise of fraudulent activities facilitated by deepfake technologies, which have raised concerns across various sectors, including legal, ethical, and personal domains. Moreover, it opens avenues for victims of such fraudulent representations to seek civil damages, potentially leading to increased accountability for misuse of synthetic media.

Summary

House Bill 697 addresses the use of synthetic media, specifically in the context of furthering crimes involving fraud. The proposed law aims to establish specific penalties for those who utilize synthetic media, which includes digitally manipulated audio, images, and videos, with malicious intent. The bill specifically mandates that using synthetic media to commit a criminal offense will constitute a separate offense punishable as a Class 1 misdemeanor. This introduces a significant legal framework surrounding the implications of technologically advanced media used in deceptive practices and crime.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 697 appears to be cautiously supportive, recognizing the necessity of legislating in response to challenges posed by evolving technology. Proponents argue that the bill provides essential protections against fraud while simultaneously addressing the concerns associated with the rapid development of synthetic media technologies. However, there are concerns among critics about the potential implications for freedom of expression and the challenges of enforcing such regulations effectively.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of defining synthetic media and the challenges that law enforcement may face in the prosecution of such cases. Critics may argue that without careful implementation, the bill could infringe on legitimate uses of technology and lead to unintended consequences, such as overreach in regulating digital content. Additionally, the bill calls for a study work group to analyze the enforcement of these new laws, indicating that further discussions will be necessary to navigate the complexities involved with synthetic media and its impact on societal norms.

Companion Bills

VA SB571

Similar To Synthetic media; expands applicability of provisions related to defamation, etc., penalty.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.