Drugs; JLARC to study scope and cost of penalizing possession as a felony.
The study directed by HJR38 aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the current laws governing felony drug possession, including the impact on adults and juveniles. This includes examining statistics related to arrests, charges, and convictions, as well as demographic data about those affected. The findings are expected to reveal critical insights into the cost implications for both the Commonwealth and local governments, particularly when comparing the enforcement of felony penalties versus treating drug possession as a lesser offense such as a Class 3 misdemeanor.
HJR38 is a joint resolution that mandates the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission (JLARC) to conduct a comprehensive study on the scope and cost of penalizing drug possession as a felony in the Commonwealth. The bill reflects a growing trend among states to reconsider the legal implications of drug possession and focuses on the potential benefits of shifting away from severe penalties associated with felony charges. By addressing the legal status of drug possession, the bill aims to foster a legislative environment that favors treatment over punishment for individuals struggling with substance use disorders.
The JLARC is tasked with completing its study by November 30, 2024, with a final report outlining their findings expected by the first day of the 2025 Regular Session. The outcomes of this resolution could significantly influence legislative approaches to drug possession laws in the Commonwealth and may lead to a broader reevaluation of how the state addresses substance use disorders.
While the resolution does not propose immediate changes to the law, it sets the groundwork for future discussions on drug policy reform based on data-driven findings. Notably, there may be divergent views among legislators regarding the prioritization of resources for treatment programs versus maintaining current punitive measures for drug possession. Proponents of HJR38 advocate for a shift towards rehabilitation and prevention strategies, suggesting that reducing criminalization could lead to better health outcomes and societal benefits. Conversely, opponents may argue that leniency could undermine deterrents against drug abuse and contribute to public safety concerns.