SB205 seeks to amend the Code of Virginia to address the installation and use of video-monitoring systems alongside automatic vehicle identification systems in all-electronic toll facilities. The bill establishes a framework for the collection of unpaid tolls through automated systems that photograph vehicles, thus capturing evidence of toll violations. The primary objective is to create a more efficient method of toll enforcement that minimizes the necessity of manual toll collection and enhances compliance by identifying non-paying vehicles swiftly.
The bill proposes significant changes to state law, particularly regarding the handling of unpaid tolls and associated penalties. It allows toll operators to install video-monitoring equipment to facilitate the collection of tolls when vehicles do not utilize manual payment methods. Specifically, it provides for the collection of unpaid tolls through the imposition of administrative fees and civil penalties that grow considerably with repeated violations. Additionally, it allows the denial of vehicle registration renewals for non-compliant drivers, which is intended to prompt timely payment of tolls.
In general, the sentiment surrounding SB205 appears to be supportive among proponents of enhanced traffic management and revenue generation for tolling authorities. Advocates argue that the enforcement mechanism is necessary to ensure equity among those using toll facilities. However, there are concerns from civil liberties advocates regarding privacy issues and the potential misuse of data collected through video surveillance systems. Critics fear that the implementation of such technology could lead to an overreach in monitoring and enforcement, raising questions about the balance between efficient toll collection and individual rights.
Notably, the bill articulates specific protections for the data collected through video-monitoring systems, restricting its usage solely for toll enforcement purposes. All images and data must be secured and cannot be made publicly available. These measures aim to address privacy concerns, though opposition remains firm regarding the overall implications of automated traffic enforcement and whether such technology could lead to unjust penalties for vehicle owners who were not the operators at the time of a violation.
An Act Concerning The State Set-aside Program, Filing Requirements Of State Contractors, Evaluation Of Contractors And Subcontractors And A Program To Increase Contracts Awarded To Resident Bidders.