Virginia 2024 Regular Session

Virginia Senate Bill SB222

Introduced
1/8/24  
Refer
1/8/24  
Report Pass
2/7/24  
Report Pass
2/12/24  
Engrossed
2/13/24  
Refer
2/15/24  
Report Pass
2/19/24  
Refer
2/19/24  
Report Pass
2/21/24  
Enrolled
2/29/24  
Chaptered
4/4/24  

Caption

Commonwealth information security; definitions, requirements.

Impact

This legislation impacts state laws by establishing clear guidelines regarding the use of cybersecurity tools and ensuring that public bodies report any security incidents that could threaten the integrity of the Commonwealth's information systems. Reports of such incidents must be submitted to the Virginia Fusion Intelligence Center within 24 hours, facilitating a cohesive state response to cybersecurity threats. Additionally, it eliminates any public access to cybersecurity information under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, thus ensuring confidentiality for sensitive security data.

Summary

SB222 introduces significant amendments to ยง2.2-5514 of the Code of Virginia, focusing on enhancing cybersecurity measures for public bodies. The bill defines 'cybersecurity information' extensively, encompassing a range of security protocols necessary to protect information technology systems utilized by public entities. It mandates that all public bodies adhere to certain restrictions on the use of hardware, software, and services that have been prohibited by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, thereby aiming to reinforce the security measures in place to protect sensitive state data.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding SB222 appears to be supportive of increased cybersecurity measures, with proponents emphasizing the necessity of such protections in the context of rising cyber threats. Legislators recognize the need for enhanced data security protocols to maintain public trust and protect citizens' information. However, there are concerns regarding the limitations this bill may place on transparency and access to information, invoking a discussion among stakeholders about the balance between security and public accountability.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB222 revolve around the implications of confidentiality on public access to information. Critics may argue that the strict classification of cybersecurity information could hinder oversight and accountability, potentially leaving citizens in the dark about state-level cybersecurity efforts. Others emphasize the importance of maintaining stringent security practices amidst increasing cyber threats, highlighting the need to protect sensitive information from potential exposure. This tension between security and transparency represents a significant aspect of the ongoing discussion around the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2695

California State University: Cybersecurity Regional Alliances and Multistakeholder Partnerships Pilot Program.

CA AB979

California Cybersecurity Integration Center: artificial intelligence.

CA SB265

Cybersecurity preparedness: critical infrastructure sectors.

CA SB844

California Cybersecurity Integration Center: cybersecurity improvement: reports.

NJ S3835

Establishes Office of Cybersecurity Infrastructure.

NJ A5036

Establishes Office of Cybersecurity Infrastructure.

CA AB2507

California Cybersecurity Integration Center: representatives.

CA AB1306

California Cybersecurity Integration Center.