Virginia 2025 Regular Session

Virginia House Bill HB2718

Introduced
1/17/25  
Refer
1/17/25  
Report Pass
1/30/25  
Engrossed
2/3/25  
Engrossed
2/4/25  
Refer
2/5/25  
Report Pass
2/13/25  
Engrossed
2/19/25  
Engrossed
2/20/25  
Enrolled
3/7/25  

Caption

Photo speed monitoring devices; school crossing zones.

Impact

The implementation of HB 2718 is expected to significantly amend existing traffic laws concerning speed monitoring. It will allow local and state law enforcement agencies to utilize photo speed monitoring technology for documenting vehicle speed violations at crucial locations. This could lead to increased compliance with speed limits, as the penalties would apply to offenders who exceed designated speed limits, establishing a more rigorous enforcement framework aimed at protecting vulnerable road users, particularly children near schools.

Summary

House Bill 2718 focuses on enhancing traffic safety in Virginia by permitting the use of photo speed monitoring devices in designated areas such as school crossing zones and high-risk intersection segments. The bill defines a high-risk intersection as any road segment near a school site where a traffic fatality has occurred since January 1, 2014. The aim of using these devices is to deter speeding through effective surveillance and enforcement mechanisms that can record violations with precision, thus potentially reducing the number of traffic-related accidents in sensitive areas.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2718 appears generally supportive, particularly among legislators advocating for improved traffic safety measures. Proponents of the bill emphasize the importance of protecting students and pedestrians by establishing safer road environments. However, there are concerns raised about privacy and the implications of automated enforcement, with some suggesting that reliance on technology for law enforcement may overlook the need for direct human monitoring. The balance between effective surveillance and individual rights remains a contentious topic.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the civil penalties associated with violations documented by photo monitoring devices, potentially leading to discussions on its fairness and efficacy. Critics may argue that automated enforcement can lead to a revenue-generating model for local governments, rather than solely focusing on safety improvements. The bill necessitates that vehicles exceeding the speed limit by at least ten miles per hour would incur a civil penalty, raising debates on whether such measures would serve their intended purpose without adversely affecting citizens financially.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1081

After School Education and Safety Program: funding: authorized purposes.

CA AB1051

Education finance: state special schools and diagnostic centers.

CA SB1203

School safety: lockdown training.

CA SB527

Education finance: local control funding formula: home-to-school transportation: cost-of-living adjustment.

CA AB2434

County government: allocation of state funds.

CA AB898

Criminal records: automatic conviction record relief.

CA AB1391

Education finance: transitional kindergarten: funding for basic aid school districts and necessary small schools.

NJ S1199

Creates new $100 assessment for convictions of certain sexual offenses to fund counseling for victims and their families; establishes Sexual Offender Victim Counseling Fund.