The primary focus of the bill will be to evaluate how the Dillon Rule affects the interaction between state and local authorities, particularly under contemporary challenges that local governments face. The subcommittee will analyze the feasibility and implications of potentially abrogating the Dillon Rule and determine how such changes could be implemented within the framework of Virginia law, given its longstanding adherence to this rule.
Summary
SJR18 proposes the establishment of a joint subcommittee aimed at studying the implications and operational challenges posed by the Dillon Rule in Virginia. The Dillon Rule is a judicial philosophy that restricts local governments by allowing them to exercise only those powers that are expressly granted by the state constitution or statutes. This bill attempts to assess whether the current structure serves the needs of modern local governments or if a transition to home rule would offer more flexibility and autonomy in governance.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the historical justification for the Dillon Rule, which some argue has become an obstacle for local governments aiming to respond to complex, modern-day challenges. Supporters of the bill advocate for local autonomy, suggesting that a shift towards home rule could enable localities to better manage their unique needs and avoid the inefficient burden of numerous local bills that often arise in legislative sessions. Conversely, opponents may fear that dismantling the Dillon Rule could lead to inconsistent local laws that undermine statewide uniformity and create governance challenges.
Amending House Rules 43 and 45, further providing for standing committees and subcommittees and for powers and duties of standing committees and subcommittees.
Creates certain commissions and subcommittees for the purpose of educating the general public concerning certain cultural affairs relating to African-Americans. (BDR 18-619)