Virginia House Bill HB45

Virginia 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/26/25
• Refer: 12/26/25
• Report Pass: 2/4/26

Caption

Fees to hunt, fish, and trap; free or partially discounted, reimbursement.

Impact

The bill represents a significant adjustment in how the state regulates wildlife activities, potentially simplifying access for residents and promoting outdoor engagement among various demographics, including older residents and youth. By removing licensing barriers for specific groups, the bill aims to enhance participation in hunting and fishing, which can have both cultural and economic implications, particularly in rural areas where these activities are more prevalent. Furthermore, the department will require reimbursement for lost revenues due to these exemptions, ensuring that the Game Protection Fund remains adequately funded.

Summary

House Bill 45 seeks to amend the Code of Virginia to introduce specific exemptions from license requirements for hunting, fishing, and trapping. It allows landowners and their immediate family members to engage in these activities on their properties without the need for a license, as well as stockholders of domestic corporations that own land in Virginia. Additionally, this bill stipulates that minors under the age of 16 are exempt from fishing license requirements when accompanied by a licensed adult. A unique facet of the bill is its provision for individuals aged 65 and over, allowing them to hunt or trap on their properties without a license, while imposing a nominal fee of $1 for fishing licenses in inland waters.

Contention

Controversy surrounding HB 45 could arise from concerns about wildlife conservation and management. Critics might argue that reducing licensing requirements could lead to increased pressure on local wildlife populations and ecosystems. Environmental groups may be apprehensive about the lack of regulation for hunting and fishing, fearing that it might encourage unsustainable practices. Additionally, discussions on the adequacy of the reimbursement mechanism for lost revenue could surface, questioning how the state will balance budgetary constraints with the need to protect wildlife resources.