Virginia Senate Bill SB10

Virginia 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/17/25
• Refer: 11/17/25
• Report Pass: 2/2/26
• Engrossed: 2/5/26
• Refer: 2/12/26
• Report Pass: 2/19/26
• Engrossed: 2/26/26
• Engrossed: 3/2/26
• Enrolled: 3/5/26
• Chaptered: 4/6/26
• Passed: 4/6/26

Caption

Employment prohibition exceptions; apprenticeship program for children 16 years of age or older.

Impact

This bill impacts state labor laws by delineating specific sectors where minors can gain valuable work experience while still under the protection of youth labor laws. By permitting 16-year-olds to engage in apprenticeships, it advocates for practical skill development and aligns with educational and employment opportunities in fields like information technology and the arts. The revisions aim to strike a balance between safeguarding youth welfare and providing them with the tools to contribute to the job market effectively.

Summary

SB10 seeks to amend Section 40.1-100 of the Code of Virginia, focusing on employment prohibitions for minors under 18 years of age while establishing exceptions for those aged 16 and older. The bill introduces provisions allowing 16-year-olds to participate in apprenticeship programs in regulated industries such as cosmetology and culinary arts, as well as enabling them to engage in work-based learning experiences that comply with existing safety regulations. This legislation reflects a growing recognition of the value of skill-building activities for younger individuals entering the workforce.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB10 is largely supportive, emphasizing the necessity for practical work experiences for young individuals. Advocates argue that such opportunities foster early career development, encouraging youth to acquire essential skills in a competitive job market. However, there is also concern among some groups about the potential for exploitation and the need to ensure that these apprenticeships meet high safety and educational standards.

Contention

Notable points of contention include worries regarding the adequacy of oversight for apprenticeship programs established under SB10, particularly in ensuring that these positions genuinely serve the educational interests of the minors involved. Critics may express apprehension about the varying implementation of apprenticeship regulations and whether they will effectively protect the rights and welfare of adolescent workers. Additionally, the requirement for school counselor support adds a layer of complexity, potentially leading to challenges in accessing these opportunities.