Vermont Senate Bill S0096

Vermont 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/25
• Refer: 2/28/25

Caption

An act relating to the calculation of recidivism and other related criminology measures

Impact

If passed, S.0096 would impact the state laws concerning corrections and criminal justice substantially. By calculating recidivism based on specific time frames, it may influence sentencing decisions, parole considerations, and the allocation of resources for rehabilitation programs aimed at reducing repeat offenses. The introduction of a structured classification system would enable the Department of Corrections to better monitor and respond to patterns of reoffending, which could contribute to more effective management of inmates and potentially lower recidivism rates over time.

Summary

S.0096 introduces significant amendments to the corrections framework in Vermont by redefining the calculation and classification of recidivism. The bill aims to implement a graduated system for tracking individuals who reoffend, particularly focusing on repeat violent offenders. With a detailed approach that specifies different classes of recidivism based on the time elapsed since sentencing, this bill seeks to standardize measures for assessing repeat offenses within the corrections system. Under the proposed classifications, offenders will be categorized into various classes based on how long it has been since their previous conviction before committing a new offense.

Contention

There are several points of contention surrounding the bill. Some legislators might argue that the classifications could lead to overly punitive measures for individuals who commit new offenses after lengthy periods, potentially disregarding individual circumstances and the reasons behind reoffending. Additionally, discussions may arise around how these classifications could impact funding for rehabilitative services versus punitive measures within the corrections system. Advocates for reform might voice concerns that the focus on classification could overshadow broader systemic issues related to social support for individuals post-incarceration.