Bill S0151 introduces provisions aimed at providing legal protection for individuals engaging in unpaid volunteer work for nonprofit organizations or governmental entities in Vermont. The bill allows defendants facing lawsuits related to their volunteer activities to file a special motion to strike, which can help dismiss meritless claims before they proceed to trial. This initiative is presented in response to an observed increase in lawsuits that deter individuals from offering their services to community organizations and local government.
The legislation mandates that a special motion to strike be filed within 60 days of a complaint, and it also stays all discovery proceedings until the court makes a decision on the motion. If the court grants the motion, the law stipulates that the defendant may recover costs and reasonable attorney’s fees. On the contrary, if the motion is deemed frivolous, the plaintiff may be awarded costs. This framework is designed to mitigate the risks associated with volunteering, encouraging more individuals to engage in volunteer work without fearing retribution from unfounded legal actions.
Crucially, the bill specifies that it is intended to address the community's need for more volunteers, asserting that it is in the public interest to prevent abuse of the judicial process that threatens volunteer involvement. Proponents argue that the law could enhance participation in nonprofit boards and community services, ultimately benefiting local initiatives and programs.
There is, however, potential contention surrounding the implications of this bill. Critics may argue that the provisions for filing special motions could inadvertently shield negligent behavior by volunteers and complicate the pursuit of legitimate claims against misconduct. The added legal protection for volunteers might lead to difficulties for individuals harmed by negligent acts that occur during volunteer work, possibly creating a gap in accountability. The effectiveness of these legal protections and their impact on actual cases of alleged negligence will be closely monitored, as specified in the mandate for a report due by July 1, 2026, assessing the outcomes of these motions.