Washington House Bill HB1141

Washington 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/23
• Refer: 1/9/23

Caption

Making 2021-2023 fiscal biennium second supplemental operating appropriations.

Impact

The impact of HB 1141 on state laws is significant as it seeks to provide the necessary funding adjustments to state agencies and programs. This may include allocations for education, health services, public safety, and infrastructure projects, among others. By making these appropriations, the bill supports the operational capacity of various state functions, thereby contributing to the stability of government services. The passage of this bill often reflects an understanding of the financial dynamics of state governance and the necessity of adaptive budgeting practices in response to economic changes.

Summary

House Bill 1141 revolves around making second supplemental operating appropriations for the 2021-2023 fiscal biennium. This piece of legislation is essential for adjusting the state budget as it allows for modifications to the previously approved appropriations based on the evolving financial needs of state services and responsibilities during that fiscal period. The bill is designed to ensure that state operations can be adequately funded and that essential services remain operational despite any unforeseen financial challenges that may arise during the biennium.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1141 is generally supportive among legislators who recognize the importance of maintaining sufficient funding levels for state operations. However, there may be underlying sentiments regarding fiscal discipline and the need to balance appropriations with revenue forecasts. Some legislators may raise concerns about the implications of increased spending and the necessity of ensuring that funding remains sustainable over the long term. Overall, the prevailing mood in legislative discussions emphasizes the importance of prudent financial management while recognizing the demands of state responsibilities.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 1141 may arise from debates on specific appropriations and whether certain areas require increased funding over others. Legislators may advocate for or against funding particular programs based on differing priorities, which can lead to disagreements on how to best allocate supplemental funds. Moreover, discussions around the necessity of enhancing budgetary controls or ensuring accountability in the use of appropriated funds could also surface as points of contention. Ultimately, while the goal is to ensure operational funding, varying opinions on appropriations reflect broader discussions on fiscal policy and government priorities.