Supporting students who are chronically absent and at risk for not graduating high school.
Impact
If enacted, HB2146 will significantly influence current state laws concerning educational policy and student support services. It is expected to encourage schools to adopt proactive measures in identifying and supporting chronically absent students, thereby fostering a more inclusive educational environment. By mandating support for at-risk students, the bill aims to create a statutory framework that directly addresses absenteeism as a barrier to educational success, potentially instituting new protocols within local school districts regarding attendance and engagement strategies.
Summary
House Bill 2146, titled 'Supporting Students Who Are Chronically Absent and At Risk for Not Graduating High School,' aims to address the issue of chronic absenteeism in schools by providing targeted support for students identified as at-risk of not graduating. The bill proposes the establishment of intervention programs and resources designed to keep these students engaged in their education, ensuring they receive the necessary support to improve their attendance and academic performance. Through these measures, HB2146 seeks to reduce dropout rates and enhance educational outcomes for vulnerable student populations.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HB2146 appears to be largely positive among education advocates and stakeholders who recognize the critical need for support systems for at-risk students. Many view the bill as a necessary step towards improving educational equity and addressing systemic issues that contribute to absenteeism. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the feasibility of implementation given varying district resources and the potential for differing levels of support across school systems. Thus, while general support exists, there is cautious optimism about the bill's practical implications.
Contention
Notable points of contention around HB2146 include discussions about the adequacy of funding for the proposed support programs and the specific criteria for identifying chronically absent students. Critics argue that without sufficient resources, the bill may fall short of its goals, leading to uneven application across different districts. There are also concerns about how success will be measured and whether the interventions outlined in the bill would effectively engage students or simply serve to formalize existing practices without real impact.