Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

Washington Senate Bill SB5199

Introduced
1/13/25  
Refer
1/13/25  
Report Pass
1/22/25  
Engrossed
2/5/25  
Refer
2/7/25  
Report Pass
3/26/25  
Refer
3/28/25  
Enrolled
4/22/25  
Chaptered
4/29/25  

Caption

Providing compensation to members of the department of children, youth, and families oversight board with direct lived experience.

Impact

If enacted, SB5199 will significantly impact how oversight is conducted within the Department of Children, Youth, and Families. By compensating board members with lived experience, the bill aims to enhance the board's effectiveness and the quality of its recommendations. This shift could lead to more informed decision-making processes that take into account the realities faced by individuals and families involved with the department, which could ultimately improve services and outcomes for children and young people in the state.

Summary

SB5199 is a legislative proposal aimed at addressing the compensation of members of the Department of Children, Youth, and Families Oversight Board who have direct lived experience in the matters they oversee. The intent of the bill is to acknowledge and provide financial remuneration to individuals whose personal histories and insights can contribute positively to the oversight and guidance of the department. This move is reflective of a growing recognition of the value of experiential knowledge in shaping policies and oversight frameworks within government agencies.

Contention

Several points of contention may arise regarding the implementation of SB5199. Critics may question the proper allocation of funds for board member compensation, especially in light of budget constraints within the department. Additionally, concerns may be raised about the selection criteria for board members with lived experience, ensuring that the process is transparent, equitable, and representative of diverse perspectives. Supporters argue that providing compensation is essential for valuing the contributions of those with relevant life experiences, while opponents may view it as an unnecessary expenditure or a risk of potential bias influencing board decisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.