1 | 1 | | LRB-3739/1 |
---|
2 | 2 | | JPC:skw |
---|
3 | 3 | | 2023 - 2024 LEGISLATURE |
---|
4 | 4 | | 2023 ASSEMBLY BILL 1164 |
---|
5 | 5 | | March 22, 2024 - Introduced by Representative BROOKS. Referred to Committee on |
---|
6 | 6 | | State Affairs. |
---|
7 | 7 | | AN ACT relating to: expenditure of $213,302.77 from the general fund in |
---|
8 | 8 | | payment of a claim against the state made by JRT Top Notch Roofs, LLC. |
---|
9 | 9 | | Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau |
---|
10 | 10 | | This bill directs the expenditure of $213,302.77 from the general fund in |
---|
11 | 11 | | payment of a claim against the Department of Administration by JRT Top Notch |
---|
12 | 12 | | Roofs, LLC. The claimant entered into a contract with DOA to replace the roof of |
---|
13 | 13 | | Esker Hall at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. The claimant asserts that |
---|
14 | 14 | | the bid documents stated that the project would begin “on or before” a date provided |
---|
15 | 15 | | in the notice to proceed and that the notice to proceed stated that the project would |
---|
16 | 16 | | begin “on or before” May 17, 2021. The claimant claims that the claimant submitted |
---|
17 | 17 | | a tentative schedule with a start date of April 5, 2021, which was rejected by DOA. |
---|
18 | 18 | | The claimant asserts that the later start date affected its ability to acquire project |
---|
19 | 19 | | materials in a timely manner and that DOA refused to negotiate the start date in |
---|
20 | 20 | | good faith. The claimant claims that, despite its best efforts to meet DOA demands, |
---|
21 | 21 | | DOA stopped communicating with the claimant and terminated the contract. The |
---|
22 | 22 | | claimant asserts that the schedules it proposed were contractually compliant and |
---|
23 | 23 | | that DOA had no right to terminate the contract. The claimant demands that DOA |
---|
24 | 24 | | rescind the contract termination and reinstate the claimant on the project. |
---|
25 | 25 | | Alternatively, if the claimant is not allowed to complete the project, the claimant |
---|
26 | 26 | | requests $213,302.77 in lost revenue. DOA concedes that the notice to proceed |
---|
27 | 27 | | inadvertently stated that work would begin “on or before” May 17, 2021. However, |
---|
28 | 28 | | DOA maintains that the contract signed by the claimant stated that work was to |
---|
29 | 29 | | begin “on or after” the date specified in the notice to proceed, that the bid documents |
---|
30 | 30 | | 1 |
---|
31 | 31 | | 2 - 2 -2023 - 2024 Legislature LRB-3739/1 |
---|
32 | 32 | | JPC:skw |
---|
33 | 33 | | ASSEMBLY BILL 1164 |
---|
34 | 34 | | clearly stated that mobilization was not scheduled to take place until June 2021, and |
---|
35 | 35 | | that any alleged confusion was resolved when DOA informed the claimant that it |
---|
36 | 36 | | would not be permitted to mobilize until May 17, 2021. To the extent there was any |
---|
37 | 37 | | confusion in the bid documents, DOA asserts that bidders were to notify DOA prior |
---|
38 | 38 | | to the bid opening, which the claimant did not do. In response to the claimant's |
---|
39 | 39 | | concerns about procuring materials, DOA asserts that it proposed extending the |
---|
40 | 40 | | completion deadline by 16 days. DOA further notes that the contract allowed the |
---|
41 | 41 | | claimant to obtain and request reimbursement for offsite materials storage. DOA |
---|
42 | 42 | | maintains that any difficulties obtaining project materials were caused by the |
---|
43 | 43 | | claimant's failure to purchase those materials in a timely manner. On July 21, 2022, |
---|
44 | 44 | | the claims board denied the claim because it concluded that the claim raises |
---|
45 | 45 | | questions of fact that are better evaluated by a court of law (see 2021 Senate Journal, |
---|
46 | 46 | | p. 975). |
---|
47 | 47 | | For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as |
---|
48 | 48 | | an appendix to this bill. |
---|
49 | 49 | | The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do |
---|
50 | 50 | | enact as follows: |
---|
51 | 51 | | SECTION 1.0Claim against the state. There is directed to be expended from |
---|
52 | 52 | | the appropriation under s. 20.505 (4) (d) $213,302.77 in payment of a claim against |
---|
53 | 53 | | the state brought by JRT Top Notch Roofs, LLC, Milwaukee, WI 53213, to |
---|
54 | 54 | | compensate the claimant for a contract terminated by the department of |
---|
55 | 55 | | administration related to the Esker Hall roof replacement project at the University |
---|
56 | 56 | | of Wisconsin-Whitewater. Acceptance of this payment releases this state and its |
---|
57 | 57 | | officers, employees, and agents from any further liability resulting from the |
---|
58 | 58 | | termination of the contract between the claimant and the department of |
---|
59 | 59 | | administration. |
---|
60 | 60 | | (END) |
---|
61 | 61 | | 1 |
---|
62 | 62 | | 2 |
---|
63 | 63 | | 3 |
---|
64 | 64 | | 4 |
---|
65 | 65 | | 5 |
---|
66 | 66 | | 6 |
---|
67 | 67 | | 7 |
---|
68 | 68 | | 8 |
---|
69 | 69 | | 9 |
---|
70 | 70 | | 10 |
---|