State aid to the resident school district of a pupil attending a private school under the Racine or statewide parental choice program. (FE)
Impact
If passed, this law would significantly alter the existing process by which state aid reductions are implemented. Previously, funding cuts could be enacted based on administrative decisions without local voter input. With the enactment of AB516, any such decision would necessitate a referendum, fostering a greater degree of local engagement in educational funding decisions. This also means that school boards would need to prepare for and conduct referendums, which could increase administrative workload and possibly lead to contentious local electoral battles regarding school funding.
Summary
Assembly Bill 516 seeks to amend current legislation surrounding state aid to school districts in Wisconsin, particularly concerning students attending private schools under the Racine or statewide parental choice program. This bill would prohibit the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction from reducing state aid payments to a district unless a majority of voters in that district approve such a reduction through a referendum. The intention behind this bill is to give local electorates greater control, ensuring that any potential funding cuts have direct democratic backing, effectively increasing accountability to the constituents of each school district.
Contention
While supporters of AB516 argue that it empowers local communities and protects public funding for education, critics express concerns that it could lead to increased political maneuvering and operational delays regarding necessary budget adjustments. Opponents argue that the bill may complicate financial management for school districts, potentially discouraging fiscal responsiveness and adaptability. Furthermore, there may be apprehensions that this could politicize educational funding decisions, drawing them into more partisan debates that could impact crucial resources for schools.
Additional_info
In summary, AB516 represents a shift toward promoting voter influence over educational funding, aligning with a broader trend of local control in education. The requirement of a referendum for any state aid reduction fundamentally alters the relationship between state agencies and local school districts, establishing a framework where local electorates have a definitive voice in the funding mechanisms impacting their schools.
Increasing the per pupil payments in parental choice programs and the Special Needs Scholarship program and the per pupil payments made to independent charter schools and increasing the revenue ceiling for school districts. (FE)
Increasing the per pupil payments in parental choice programs and the Special Needs Scholarship program and the per pupil payments made to independent charter schools and increasing the revenue ceiling for school districts. (FE)
Requiring public schools and private schools participating in a parental choice program to employ a full-time librarian and a school district revenue limit adjustment for the cost of employing full-time librarians. (FE)
Requiring public schools and private schools participating in a parental choice program to employ a full-time librarian and a school district revenue limit adjustment for the cost of employing full-time librarians. (FE)
Pupil discrimination and private school participating in a parental choice program or the Special Needs Scholarship Program, discrimination based on gender identity or gender expression, and providing a penalty.
Requires availability of outside voting process for elderly or voters with disabilities when their assigned polling place does not meet accessibility requirements.