Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB565

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/26/23
• Refer: 10/26/23
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Authorizing certain full-time positions within the Department of Safety and Professional Services and making an appropriation. (FE)

Impact

The proposed increase in staffing within the Department of Safety and Professional Services is significant as it aims to address the backlog and inefficiencies currently experienced in professional licensing. With increased resources, the department will be better positioned to process applications more quickly, potentially leading to a decrease in waiting times for applicants. This bill is particularly relevant as it relates to the broader goals of state government efficiency and service enhancement to constituents. The funding provided by the bill is scheduled for the fiscal years 2023-24 and 2024-25, suggesting a commitment to long-term improvements in service delivery.

Summary

Assembly Bill 565 seeks to enhance the operational capacity of the Department of Safety and Professional Services by authorizing the addition of several full-time positions dedicated to processing professional license applications and improving communication with the public. Specifically, the bill allocates funding for hiring nine staff members to handle credential applications and eight staff members focused on customer communication. Additionally, it includes two positions aimed at assisting individuals, employers, and institutions of higher education in navigating the credentialing process. This enhancement is expected to result in a more efficient processing system and improved public engagement.

Contention

While the bill has several points of support, detailed contention points have not been specifically documented within the provided text. However, discussions around similar legislative efforts often revolve around budgeting concerns—ensuring that the appropriated funds will be used efficiently and effectively without compromising other state services. Additional points of contention could also arise from the varying opinions on the necessary size of government and the prioritization of funds towards operational enhancements versus other potential legislative needs.