Employer liability under worker's compensation for mandatory or coerced vaccines.
The implications of AB613 are notable as it alters the landscape of worker's compensation laws in Wisconsin. By establishing a presumption of work-relatedness for vaccine injuries, it increases protections for employees who might otherwise struggle to claim compensation. Proponents of the bill suggest that it serves as a safeguard for employees against potential injury caused by mandatory health measures enforced by employers, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to widespread vaccine mandates. Thus, AB613 addresses a gap in existing law regarding employer responsibilities and employee welfare.
Assembly Bill 613 focuses on the employer's liability in relation to worker's compensation when employees are required or coerced into receiving vaccines. Under this bill, if an employee sustains an injury from a vaccine mandated by their employer, the injury is presumed to be work-related. This is a significant shift in how such injuries are treated, as it imposes a presumption of causation without the need for extensive proof that the vaccine injury occurred within the scope of employment, provided that a specific diagnosis from a physician is presented. This presumption can, however, be challenged with evidence proving that the injury was not caused by the vaccine.
While the bill is designed to protect employee rights, there are points of contention regarding its implementation. Critics may argue that the presumption of injury being work-related could lead to increased claims against employers, potentially raising their liability and insurance costs. Additionally, the requirement for a physician's diagnosis might complicate the claims process, distinguishing between genuine claims and those potentially fabricated or exaggerated. This dynamic could create friction between employers and their employees, especially in an environment sensitive to public health concerns and individual rights.