Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB757

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/6/23
• Refer: 12/6/23
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Climate control in state correctional institutions and county jails and houses of correction and making an appropriation. (FE)

Impact

The implementation of AB757 will entail significant changes to state laws governing correctional facility operations. Specifically, the Department of Corrections (DOC) is directed to report on and prioritize the installation of climate control systems over several years—one-third of facilities by 2027, another third by 2029, and the remaining facilities by 2033. This gradual rollout is aimed at ensuring that the necessary infrastructure is in place to meet these standards, which could lead to improved living conditions within such facilities and may reduce liability related to extreme temperature conditions affecting inmate health.

Summary

Assembly Bill 757 aims to establish specific climate control regulations in state correctional institutions and county jails in Wisconsin. The bill mandates that temperatures within housing units must be maintained between 68 and 76 degrees Fahrenheit. It requires that the wardens and superintendents ensure that all heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems are operational. The bill also stipulates that temperature recordings must be made for each housing unit during extreme outdoor temperatures, either below 10 degrees Fahrenheit or above 90 degrees Fahrenheit. This monitoring requirement aims to ensure the safety and comfort of inmates, particularly during drastic weather conditions.

Contention

There may be notable points of contention surrounding AB757, including concerns over the financial implications of installing and maintaining these HVAC systems at an estimated cost of $65 million for the implementation phase starting in 2024-25. Stakeholders might debate the fiscal responsibility of funding such initiatives, especially in light of other pressing state budget needs. Additionally, while proponents emphasize the necessity for humane living conditions in correctional settings, opponents may argue about prioritizing such expenditures in light of other potential reforms needed in the correctional system.