The use of automated speed enforcement systems and traffic control photographic systems in a first class city and providing a penalty. (FE)
Impact
The bill proposes to amend existing laws related to traffic enforcement by allowing for a new mechanism of automated monitoring. Under this legislation, local law enforcement agencies are empowered to issue forfeitures for speed limit violations detected by ASES, provided those violations involve exceeding the speed limit by at least 20 miles per hour. Forfeitures collected from these violations are designated for use by the local law enforcement agency that issued the citation, supporting further traffic safety initiatives within the community. Provisions also exist for the TCPS, which focuses on monitoring red light compliance at intersections.
Summary
Assembly Bill 85 introduces provisions for utilizing automated speed enforcement systems (ASES) and traffic control photographic systems (TCPS) specifically in first class cities, with Milwaukee being the only city classified as such currently. The bill allows local law enforcement to identify speed limit and traffic signal violations through these automated systems, aiming to enhance traffic compliance and improve public safety. Furthermore, it sets forth guidelines and administrative requirements for municipalities that opt to implement these enforcement systems, including periodic reporting on their usage and effectiveness.
Contention
While the bill has garnered support for its potential to improve traffic safety and reduce violations, it has also faced criticisms regarding civil liberties and overreach. Opponents argue that reliance on automated systems may lead to concerns over fairness, accountability, and privacy. Furthermore, the bill's stipulation of penalties tied to vehicle ownership rather than driver control raises legal questions about accountability and the implications for vehicle lessees. Consequently, discussions have emerged around ensuring proper community engagement and transparency about the deployment and functioning of these automated systems.
In rules of the road in general, further providing for automated enforcement of failure to stop for school bus with flashing red lights, for automated speed enforcement systems in active work zones and for pilot program for automated speed enforcement system on designated highway and providing for automated speed enforcement study and for pilot program for automated speed enforcement systems in designated school zones; and imposing a penalty.
Relating to the authority of the governing body of a local authority to impose a civil penalty for certain violations recorded by an automated traffic control system or a photographic traffic signal enforcement system; providing a civil penalty.