Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB937

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/24
• Refer: 1/12/24
• Report Pass: 2/7/24
• Refer: 2/7/24
• Engrossed: 2/20/24
• Refer: 2/26/24
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

Incorporating cursive writing into the state model English language arts standards and requiring cursive writing in elementary grades. (FE)

Impact

The implementation of AB937 is set to affect several key areas within the education system. It will require all educational entities serving elementary grades to design their curricula to meet this new standard and will thus alter existing educational frameworks. The bill's provisions will take effect for the 2024-25 school year, allowing time for schools to adapt their programs accordingly. However, exceptions exist for union high school districts, which are not subject to this change, thereby preserving their existing curricular autonomy in upper-grade levels.

Summary

Assembly Bill 937 aims to integrate cursive writing instruction into the state model academic standards for English language arts, requiring that elementary schools in Wisconsin ensure pupils can write legibly in cursive by the end of fifth grade. Introduced by a group of bipartisan representatives, the bill mandates that this curriculum be included not only in public schools but also in independent charter schools and private schools participating in parental choice programs. The intended effect is to revive cursive writing in educational settings, which has seen a decline in emphasis with the rise of digital communication methods.

Contention

Arguments for and against AB937 center around the relevance and necessity of cursive writing in contemporary education. Proponents assert that cursive writing is an essential skill that promotes literacy and fine motor skills, arguing it prepares students for real-world tasks such as signing documents and sends a signal about the value of traditional methods of communication. Conversely, opponents suggest this focus may detract from more pressing educational needs, voicing concerns that it could consume valuable classroom time that could be better spent on subjects deemed more critical, such as digital literacy or STEM subjects.