Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB967

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/24
• Refer: 1/16/24
• Report Pass: 2/7/24
• Refer: 2/7/24
• Engrossed: 2/15/24
• Refer: 2/19/24
• Enrolled: 3/15/24
• Chaptered: 3/28/24
• Passed: 3/28/24

Caption

Withholding judicial security profiles from public access.

Impact

If enacted, AB967 would amend existing laws related to public access to judicial records. By establishing that judicial security profiles are exempt from public disclosure, the bill would significantly alter how security information is managed within the judicial system. This change is intended to provide judges with a safer working environment by limiting access to sensitive data that could potentially be used to harm them.

Summary

Assembly Bill 967 (AB967) aims to enhance judicial safety by creating provisions for withholding judicial security profiles from public access. The legislation defines 'judicial officer' and provides a framework for the management of security profile forms used by these officers. The intent is to bolster security and privacy for judges and their emergency response plans, reflecting a growing concern over the safety of judicial personnel in light of rising threats against them.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB967 appears favorable among legislators concerned with judicial safety. Supporters advocate for the importance of protecting judges from intimidation and violence, particularly in a climate where judicial independence is viewed as vulnerable. However, some critics may raise concerns about the implications of restricting public access to judicial records, arguing that transparency is vital in maintaining public trust in the judicial system.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the implications of enforcing such restrictions. While proponents emphasize safety, opponents may argue that such measures could lead to a lack of accountability and transparency in the judicial process. Additionally, there may be concerns regarding the definition of 'judicial security profiles' and the criteria for which profiles should be withheld, ensuring that the bill does not broadly extend to limit public access unnecessarily.