Wisconsin Assembly Bill AB989

Wisconsin 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/24
• Refer: 1/25/24
• Failed: 4/15/24

Caption

University of Wisconsin System resident undergraduate tuition freeze and making an appropriation. (FE)

Impact

To support the tuition freeze, the bill includes a $38 million increase in the state's general program operations appropriation for the University of Wisconsin System for the 2024-25 fiscal year. This funding is crucial to offset the potential revenue loss from not increasing tuition. By legislating this freeze, the state aims to ensure that higher education remains accessible and affordable, particularly for in-state students. With tuition rates stabilizing, the bill is expected to provide relief for current and incoming students, making it easier for families to plan for college expenses.

Summary

Assembly Bill 989, also known as the University of Wisconsin System resident undergraduate tuition freeze bill, aims to maintain the current academic fees charged to resident undergraduates at the University of Wisconsin System for the 2024-25 academic year. The bill stipulates that the Board of Regents cannot increase the fees beyond those charged in the previous academic year. This legislation comes in response to concerns regarding the rising cost of higher education and the financial burden on students and their families. The proposal represents a significant move toward stabilizing tuition rates at public universities in Wisconsin.

Contention

Although the bill is largely framed as beneficial for students, there are points of contention among legislators and education advocates. Some critics argue that the funding increase may not sufficiently cover inflation-related increases in operational costs for the University of Wisconsin System, which could lead to budget shortfalls in other areas of the university operations. Additionally, discussions are ongoing about the potential long-term implications of such funding measures on the quality of education and operational capabilities of these institutions. Supporters believe the bill prioritizes student affordability, while detractors are concerned about sustainability and the broader impact on educational services.